IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 30 March 2017 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36E8129464 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9rIWboACyID for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64011267BB for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l7so26133589ioe.3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=AbBkkAg5HopSwnNQZm6fTlP4eOGkNI312yA+bblpRII=; b=cj9UNsnDZO9O2av4bQPGJ34QCYGsaaUz5bYjNxL1faKsslKHK1b2rEAnxB7QiU7R12 ubcoPLDBPdR2uYPvPYIzVNzWEB3/3P3PwjAIZx14Yu35iOpxU30WQnMGUBIJbFxapwJG m1i7nAXmJyVKYX2sxTpoM+PhjUGM3LtvuKBzJJSSU/ZgbkW5yuap2NyAwK4wFufOXdC+ i0fVHhC/ANuB9Mx/SdDWWScViKmL/9zTGY5Xg6em21BXSPiXiWgeB8MjhyLnL7NV3nuK wYpdFN7R8WZ1hP5Ko+c9zDlJEC1s6De/KunLIAfuKOQ9yzgYxF0UBuD4oiQcdjbnErF2 SisQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AbBkkAg5HopSwnNQZm6fTlP4eOGkNI312yA+bblpRII=; b=eFoqU1UNY0U/knfk7ASCc3pwI7Lbl9JyxDuCR3at66R81DjXhGDU/02QWrVTQGm0tS BfMDJADqR+3+dDNwCjxfX5rbeDWqSfYRCJ7L9TMb6PDxHhYp9iUAcMKgV6hYD6tkGW5C PJ+xTWZeOieuDTyOjETNtY+hx51+nv5aE/o6R2jVdjlybws3NeyVz7g5CKHZDAr6Hu2Y qYsh27Aumen9iRrhUioVVaEjOdH+TpT9spje4FTGjW67Ji6SdnS5+ldc3UQ/BPBNKeqI IMxZP4sVHzLBErZCo69xk6wqmMZYeE0Ue0YJaOcFLRHqHrMixwIYgv/ECkPBVJ9eOP9K 4yUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3EbLN+4eVy3hLHUk03TDgMa2pyubcOOm1ZL9JdydwoOcEdQ/rwOufDORETlYYePnk6QSo0jjkb9N4Mnw==
X-Received: by 10.107.7.29 with SMTP id 29mr2543334ioh.57.1490901327905; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.90.71 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.90.71 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmdFbg_cFjysHQwkLY-+i1ERL9u+hEeVThStkhEi9gYxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+b+ERkC4h4FY8zrFwbED-hWcQ8YkCOa_zfya6J50pOmSBnFiA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm3vebcL2ft_g4870uRN9S_VkXR_-JAWdqueQsPGyFhQQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=KwTOcwsvuoBoD3eim7dkMgSfUtdX-z6B2dU9dmP0aeg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkKj=VKNSLW=A_gurMZtZ-sFtvHZdB8r1mTTz77LOcWBg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnrVPJyw8RmvD6+3td2eE2q4KZ4-LkcVxL9pk9Km0EK=A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmdFbg_cFjysHQwkLY-+i1ERL9u+hEeVThStkhEi9gYxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:15:27 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tdtzhF3LOrJZVKXju6YXLRbN4Ww
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=+UNUtzamduonsTs3WkZsadSCCa_-6dMb6DCvwyTMDRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ospf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ea6f00b8983054bf7842a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/EYuEXBQUY4m9YcZyizosXNIZPt0>
Subject: [OSPF] draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:15:31 -0000

Hi,

Based on the discussion so far I see that:

A) producing use case document will only delay things further as each use
case presented will be questioned as possible already today via MTR, MI,
building new separate network etc ...

B) WG members in majority support adoption of
draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.
Can we get at least sense in the room who is in support of which draft ?

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email