[OSPF] OSPF/ISIS bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip publications

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 02:14 UTC

References: <1332bb78-36a8-2888-2642-f08a30593a10@cisco.com>
To: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Cc: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9274a012-54b4-555b-5676-0da13a7fa22c@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:14:20 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1332bb78-36a8-2888-2642-f08a30593a10@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C897CC6CF3BDC224E97A6A00"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Ey2dxofeNKB2lpGxPiRysTa0o1g>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF/ISIS bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip publications
Precedence: list

Dear all,

[I understand that I will reach both ISIS and OSPF folks with this mailer]

The ask for this group is to progress those documents:

  * draft-ietf-ospf-yang: ietf-ospf (draft status: still ID-exists)
  * draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg: ietf-isis (draft status: still ID-exists)

https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/module_details.php?module=ietf-ospf@2017-10-30.yang

     => it passes validation and is NMDA compliant. Good.

https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/module_details.php?module=ietf-isis@2017-07-25.yang

     => it doesn't pass validation: 
https://yangcatalog.org/results/ietf-isis@2017-07-25_ietf.html
     => it's not NMDA compliant (tree-type = split)

Regards, Benoit

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	NETMOD bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and 
draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip publications
Date: 	Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:02:27 +0800
From: 	Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: 	NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>rg>, ospf-chairs@ietf.org 
<ospf-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, isis-chairs@ietf.org <isis-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: 	Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>om>, 
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>



Dear all,

Currently sitting in the rtgwg WG.
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp and draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip are currently in 
AD review.
Let's look at the datatracker new YANG-related URLs to understand the 
impact analysis (the dependent YANG modules) for these two drafts:

  * https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-vrrp@2017-10-25.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both
  * https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-rip@2017-10-25.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=both

So the bottlenecks for standardization are:

  * draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp:
      o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
      o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip

  * draft-ietf-rtwg-yang-rip:
      o RFC7223bis: ietf-interfaces
      o RFC7277bis: ietf-ip
      o RFC8022bis: ietf-routing
      o draft-ietf-ospf-yang: ietf-ospf (draft status: still ID-exists)
      o draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg: ietf-isis (draft status: still
        ID-exists)

So the ask to close on RFC7223bis, RFC7277bis, and RFC8022bis asap.
I understand the LC will start soon for these drafts.

Regards, Benoit

[OSPF] OSPF/ISIS bottlenecks for draft-ietf-rtgwg… Benoit Claise