Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-18.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 24 July 2017 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE24131E88 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPD0ilJ24BlE for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5E9131E8E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3470; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1500912458; x=1502122058; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=OKoTKyVAvRld6kf3IiarrNtYxQIGbMtC8jFRnuoeyAI=; b=L4uyOCWtqgRG/+6GkwQKIa5BRhwVgMX5n5eWTDMWGhkyvMo5IQ0i2/Vd InBE3Y+ZSKRRO7AyXY0tOzOXk+9F6nwqB5zNicdNsPtKEQ/KvWTUOI3sU kEXgMM2kUn8J3L8dY7vDaZT12NpT4IFgpnaeoP81wEizA34ML4AXWtqmw k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CYAAD7GnZZ/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRQHjgWnbIISIQ2FGQIag04/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkCAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?BASEROgsQAgEIDgwCJgICAiULFRACBA4Fii8Qr06CJoszAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBHYELgh2FLYMlgyaBRYMTgmEFn04Ch0yMUIIMV4R5iluVYwEfOIE?= =?us-ascii?q?KdRUfKoUTHIFndohVgQ4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,407,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="460357644"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jul 2017 16:07:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6OG7Sdw002059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:07:28 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:07:27 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:07:27 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>
CC: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-18.txt
Thread-Index: AQHS/7V3/S6WoAbRSkGP1I3k1ReqD6JjLm0A
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:07:27 +0000
Message-ID: <D59B8E2D.B9F66%acee@cisco.com>
References: <150037579221.11413.9963777379788099936@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150037579221.11413.9963777379788099936@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2A9186B03ABED543B98A2881145405B2@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/F6Sjgwgq1qv1PwVZdfrRiXMRfiI>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-18.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:07:40 -0000

This version includes updates addressed AD comments including removing the
ERO and Binding-SID extensions. After discussions between Peter Psenak and
various parties, it was decided not to add the Binding-SID back and this
will potentially be addressed by Peter and Shraddha in a subsequent draft.

I’ve also updated the Shepherd’s report:

  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions
/shepherdwriteup/

Thanks,
Acee 

On 7/18/17, 7:03 AM, "OSPF on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
<ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
>This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the IETF.
>
>        Title           : OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing
>        Authors         : Peter Psenak
>                          Stefano Previdi
>                          Clarence Filsfils
>                          Hannes Gredler
>                          Rob Shakir
>                          Wim Henderickx
>                          Jeff Tantsura
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-18.txt
>	Pages           : 28
>	Date            : 2017-07-18
>
>Abstract:
>   Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end paths
>   within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological
>   sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are advertised by the
>   link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).
>
>   This draft describes the OSPF extensions required for Segment
>   Routing.
>
>
>
>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extension
>s/
>
>There are also htmlized versions available at:
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-18
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-exte
>nsions-18
>
>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensio
>ns-18
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf