Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll

Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org> Mon, 11 April 2016 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@jakma.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C015C12D758 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jakma-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDfgmeclpMlJ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F1412D136 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f198so149564903wme.0 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jakma-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=sKTwrByePjGDdgH//WBenNXtD9NiJocojvMVq97FA1o=; b=t6PO29R+CmuZSgbZynAyp08awdCbuKbLb5PqWG/OUvXtAR8yPWpt2W/Ol0RxJV1/v8 JJpFiVOmZqi4VcaEHaxiIX562BkKwg3r7UJYWCBYRFPQp4FCwJdWz4+tWeRV4bUW2gLA zxxrLluhunLf1dIUD6wxBqlPluahzGv3pRuclWo7KXGXHufDs0z9zzUGJ93RU28Ai7es LrQqLPFuW+OrHcEy7rr7EmvBZjyy5kaT0ao/UNp+qAFmmp+2DpQr+iif5rzCC0NEjSKG 0US40mQB1tHf8Koy/AqSVIsPZl/38kNDj3OTQ6VNDDj3ljusF8brbXj7vhyxYWLwzrpQ lJvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=sKTwrByePjGDdgH//WBenNXtD9NiJocojvMVq97FA1o=; b=gBP43fsKT3wd5qxVC2IS9q0YqZHCov4AuBZg89BwQTtPI09uG1C0jCWcvOeAgkxcat dKhqPTBddQ9qmppYu8rMEb8+7MOkYp4/ct73qZFmpH0dSevtOo0oIWSKl01f4QIvB7hl sNjgNMkB3MLwRw7qELvyxuKTGTKutJ8xjIE85NyFSpXBYweYitAPVclkDXX5D+ZlwV/d wrhdQBv/7QWnYYxdfIA4yWyj4mQcx1+RQC1FS3fhBNNwc0mEouetk5OlHE+lR5hp7oPw KkTvJBG6yDx0YF2YSIZUvAqIYkb5GDaapMi0ffO0+PZPDOvDvJJEgIL1sLIllyN8pR+/ wa8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLA9oss2r1M/DW7VYz9ODqCTImNj6+AcWtl7XTrX5+aISBhTl/6X7NPHPkzROnrkA==
X-Received: by 10.28.213.142 with SMTP id m136mr19406256wmg.24.1460386847919; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stoner.jakma.org (stoner.jakma.org. [81.168.24.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ux5sm28324298wjc.17.2016.04.11.08.00.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:00:45 +0100 (BST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D22C6483.32EB0%acee@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1604111547110.14532@stoner.jakma.org>
References: <D22C6483.32EB0%acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
X-Snooper: A life spent reading others private email is a sad and wasted one
X-NSA: nitrate toxic DNDO hostage al aqsar fluffy jihad DHS cute musharef kittens jet-A1 ear avgas wax ammonium bad qran dog inshallah allah al-akbar martyr iraq hammas hisballah rabin ayatollah korea revolt mustard gas x-ray british airways hydrogen washington peroxide cool FEMA emergency four lions encryption ricin table pandemic scanner power sleet catalyst injection acetone
X-KEYSCORE: The greatest long-term threats to freedom and democracy are based in Langley and Fort Meade and Cheltenham
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/FYufLRcBVSHpA33G2z_iAHOMCU0>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:00:52 -0000

Hi,

Support, and hope this progresses to standards track ASAP.

regards,

Paul

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:

> This draft was presented in Prague and there was consensus in the room
> that it was a valid use case. It provides protocol mechanisms to
> absolutely prevent transit traffic for OSPFv2 Routers (RFC 6987 only
> discourages transit traffic). The draft also includes assurance of
> backward compatibility.
>
> Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
> Document.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

-- 
Paul Jakma	paul@jakma.org	@pjakma	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
A vivid and creative mind characterizes you.