IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] IPR Disclosure Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 16 June 2016 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CF512D192; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SF6rbCzOZjkJ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7CF12D18C; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p10so54613760qke.3; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CJWTtv6SBwq2OYb0TxvOEe0uBXE1mzSMijQ+mUh7WUM=; b=fjJ1suYiZgkMIb4BAm5ofb9I8xvT7/iZGjL+TzatpwQAYMuId2heEd6pVNrGxcYX4Q 7u/7RLydH+BS9qfhbDvrxTnNk29PRacSarUclssBUjp40gsQBKRXMFXXoSJqJB7srwAh Xb25BfUWTQtOE96/9SMZGljuB+865LGmiqkwmPE4qcf9rFE/yzNHQUL262NThilbwgSf hUosw1tMqNy3IPesnB3fyHzKzcBdJ4aETdjLkgvxaSwFUKSkECNKALBfIRQADV869dUS wuKZ7yhQblgAs5KaFU0g3igj2zdr+Y+ntMUnElgAo4M6fD5fb8mZA94AbmP346icVxvT cBwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CJWTtv6SBwq2OYb0TxvOEe0uBXE1mzSMijQ+mUh7WUM=; b=IZwDAACp8tIiln6cigSWfOc5WDIxa4y38j8a6iM2zcEu083dAyE7mLch0nfovZf2Ql FmDn+HIZ8fzdViQ1di5MSaF3XQqbkJ272A9UujZ1Xb/Zrw6Nliv8rMAoDd1ugqHkKCSP bi2ZNYe0GQt8sezrasQXReHKPikSw626r/reY4kHai7UrTgbIOlNmrFQkdshYM7f0phg SOAa8pSfA1kYKIxjjTFzXy4DZZbFt0GZTm20WWvWqdDpuEnUjXnHovfcGY2g0tN77sTU AeTQEL9Lx4x0Jq1QocmCbHptCpgQj9bkAhly+6uxrljGeBNtSWA10tY4DjanxAmNi0F5 4g6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLdI9hCzXbPXFxhAVRtI9TKj737KtPDy+xtAyIK5+0Qqm+X52LOtd4+U8YWTn14vjlx7PRe+MghFtxgfA==
X-Received: by 10.55.87.194 with SMTP id l185mr2130290qkb.204.1466087282100; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.57.81 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57624F51.1050400@cisco.com>
References: <20160615224723.26169.55291.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAG4d1rc-ezvD92otKDLro4CAAygvctHFiUYHEw191naf-9BSRw@mail.gmail.com> <57624F51.1050400@cisco.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:28:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfKi69SthxPDs2YnFL_LOqhSYzbsLjL0sRf96_KMGAP5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e7322a8d4070535660b87"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/FrhlAwapD5i74wf4fPfPDcZpmeQ>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR Disclosure Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:28:05 -0000

Peter,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> wrote:

> Alia,
>
> On 6/16/16 01:09 , Alia Atlas wrote:
>
>> Stefano, Clarence, and Peter,
>>
>> Could you please clarify if this IPR disclosure is simply updating the
>> previously
>> disclosed IPR or represents additional IPR?
>>
>
> we updated the previous IPR with additional patent application.
>

Ok - this is after the confirmations on the list that there was no new IPR?
That sounds like new IPR to me.

While I realize that the company claiming IPR and the terms haven't
changed, since
the IPR has changed, I think this needs to go back to the WG for an
additional WGLC.

Regards,
Alia



> thanks,
> Peter
>
>
>> I do see that there is at least some overlap.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alia
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:47 PM, IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org
>> <mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Dear Peter Psenak, Stefano Previdi, Clarence Filsfils, Wim
>>     Henderickx, Jeff Tantsura, Hannes Gredler, Rob Shakir:
>>
>>
>>     An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "OSPF
>>     Extensions for Segment Routing"
>>     (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions) was submitted to the IETF
>>     Secretariat on  and has been posted on the "IETF Page of
>>     Intellectual Property
>>     Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2808/). The
>>     title of the
>>     IPR disclosure is "Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related
>> to
>>     draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions"
>>
>>
>>     Thank you
>>
>>     IETF Secretariat
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     OSPF mailing list
>>     OSPF@ietf.org <mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email