IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why recalculation from scratch?

satish dattatri <satish_dattatri@YAHOO.COM> Thu, 15 August 2002 22:21 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA18187 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:21:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <11.006D7869@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:22:29 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 112675 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:22:27 -0400
Received: from 216.136.226.161 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:22:27 -0400
Received: from [12.235.194.197] by web20603.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:22:27 PDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <20020815222227.45526.qmail@web20603.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:22:27 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: satish dattatri <satish_dattatri@YAHOO.COM>
Subject: Re: Why recalculation from scratch?
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <B036F14C7A7FD511827000805FFEA8AD0C9E8F@BHAM-EEE-FS7>
Precedence: list

> I am reading RFC1195 and 1142 (the latest version
> ISO10589v2-2001-07-04?)
> now and hopefully, I can find some quantified performance
> comparation
> between the full SPF and the incremental one. Satish, would
> you please tell
> me where can I find the ball and string model paper you
> mentioned?
>


http://perth.mit.edu/~pnarvaez/mypapers/paper7_tech.pdf
Also, see for some other info , field experiment data .

http://www.packetdesign.com/Documents/qwest.pdf


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status