Re: [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Routing in Free Range Routing
Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 17:03 UTC
Return-Path: <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50973126C2F; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:03:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvGjRljpLABD; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5BD12D834; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D5210A4423A; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD281A44239; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from renot.local (10.192.150.9) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0100
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <7ff65339-d8f2-c640-2f68-bf9ddea7b871@orange.com> <E21A2D91-38CB-47F9-802E-5C390B25C55E@cisco.com>
From: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
Message-ID: <e47d1125-4ad8-4f46-d3f9-c52ddc6ff868@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:03:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E21A2D91-38CB-47F9-802E-5C390B25C55E@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A132FD814E8AE2ECCBFB6852"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/GJGKVKDyNudWDpaYyd7TKPzGzmM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Routing in Free Range Routing
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 17:03:24 -0000
Hi Acee, Unfortunately not. The next step from our side will be SR for IS-IS and PCC supporting SR. Concerning OSPFv3, I have no particular knowledge of the current implementation in FRRouting. I think it is far from OSPFv2, so, there is certainly a huge base work to be coded before adding Extended LSAs and Router Information. Regards Olivier Le 07/02/2018 à 15:43, Acee Lindem (acee) a écrit : > > Hi Olivier, > > Great news Olivier! I’m hoping you are looking at OSPFv3 Extended LSAs > and OSPFv3 SR as well. > > Thanks, > Acee > > *From: *OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Olivier Dugeon > <olivier.dugeon@orange.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 3:13 PM > *To: *SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Routing in > Free Range Routing > > Hi all, > > We are please to announce that we have added Experimental support of > OSPF SR > (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-24) in Free Range Routing > protocol suite https://frrouting.org > > This feature is available on the master branch: > https://github.com/FRRouting/frr > and will be part of the future 4.0 release. > > Supported Features: > > * Automatic computation of Primary and Backup Adjacency SID with > Cisco experimental remote IP address > * SRGB configuration > * Prefix configuration for Node SID with optional NO-PHP flag (Linux > kernel support both mode) > * Node MSD configuration (with Linux Kernel >= 4.10 a maximum of 32 labels > could be stack) > * Automatic provisioning of MPLS table > * Static route configuration with label stack up to 32 labels > > Interoperability: > * tested on various topology including point-to-point and LAN interfaces > in a mix of Free Range Routing instance and Cisco IOS-XR 6.0.x > * check OSPF LSA conformity with latest wireshark release 2.5.0-rc > > Known limitations > > * Runs only within default VRF > * Only single Area is supported. ABR is not yet supported > * Only SPF algorithm is supported > * Extended Prefix Range is not supported > * MPLS table are not flush at startup. Thus, restarting zebra process is > mandatory to remove old MPLS entries in the data plane after a crash of > ospfd daemon > * With NO Penultimate Hop Popping, it is not possible to express a Segment > Path with an Adjacency SID due to the impossibility for the Linux > Kernel to > perform double POP instruction. > > For details implementation & instructions on how to use this new feature, > please consult doc/OSPF-SR.rst. > > Regards > > FRR team > -- logo Orange <http://www.orange.com> Olivier Dugeon Senior research engineer in QoS and network control Open Source Referent Orange/IMT/OLN/WTC/IEE/OPEN fixe : +33 2 96 07 28 80 mobile : +33 6 82 90 37 85 olivier.dugeon@orange.com <mailto:olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
- [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Rou… Olivier Dugeon
- Re: [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment… Olivier Dugeon