Re: [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Routing in Free Range Routing

Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50973126C2F; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:03:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvGjRljpLABD; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5BD12D834; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D5210A4423A; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD281A44239; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from renot.local (10.192.150.9) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0100
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <7ff65339-d8f2-c640-2f68-bf9ddea7b871@orange.com> <E21A2D91-38CB-47F9-802E-5C390B25C55E@cisco.com>
From: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
Message-ID: <e47d1125-4ad8-4f46-d3f9-c52ddc6ff868@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:03:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E21A2D91-38CB-47F9-802E-5C390B25C55E@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A132FD814E8AE2ECCBFB6852"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/GJGKVKDyNudWDpaYyd7TKPzGzmM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Routing in Free Range Routing
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 17:03:24 -0000

Hi Acee,

Unfortunately not. The next step from our side will be SR for IS-IS and 
PCC supporting SR.

Concerning OSPFv3, I have no particular knowledge of the current 
implementation in FRRouting. I think it is far from OSPFv2, so, there is 
certainly a huge base work to be coded before adding Extended LSAs and 
Router Information.

Regards

Olivier


Le 07/02/2018 à 15:43, Acee Lindem (acee) a écrit :
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Great news Olivier! I’m hoping you are looking at OSPFv3 Extended LSAs 
> and OSPFv3 SR as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> *From: *OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Olivier Dugeon 
> <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 3:13 PM
> *To: *SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[OSPF] Experimental support of OSPFv2 Segment Routing in 
> Free Range Routing
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are please to announce that we have added Experimental support of 
> OSPF SR
> (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-24) in Free Range Routing
> protocol suite https://frrouting.org
>
> This feature is available on the master branch: 
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr
> and will be part of the future 4.0 release.
>
> Supported Features:
>
> * Automatic computation of Primary and Backup Adjacency SID with
> Cisco experimental remote IP address
> * SRGB configuration
> * Prefix configuration for Node SID with optional NO-PHP flag (Linux
> kernel support both mode)
> * Node MSD configuration (with Linux Kernel >= 4.10 a maximum of 32 labels
> could be stack)
> * Automatic provisioning of MPLS table
> * Static route configuration with label stack up to 32 labels
>
> Interoperability:
> * tested on various topology including point-to-point and LAN interfaces
> in a mix of Free Range Routing instance and Cisco IOS-XR 6.0.x
> * check OSPF LSA conformity with latest wireshark release 2.5.0-rc
>
> Known limitations
>
> * Runs only within default VRF
> * Only single Area is supported. ABR is not yet supported
> * Only SPF algorithm is supported
> * Extended Prefix Range is not supported
> * MPLS table are not flush at startup. Thus, restarting zebra process is
>   mandatory to remove old MPLS entries in the data plane after a crash of
>   ospfd daemon
> * With NO Penultimate Hop Popping, it is not possible to express a Segment
>   Path with an Adjacency SID due to the impossibility for the Linux 
> Kernel to
>   perform double POP instruction.
>
> For details implementation & instructions on how to use this new feature,
> please consult doc/OSPF-SR.rst.
>
> Regards
>
> FRR team
>

-- 
logo Orange <http://www.orange.com>

Olivier Dugeon
Senior research engineer in QoS and network control
Open Source Referent
Orange/IMT/OLN/WTC/IEE/OPEN

fixe : +33 2 96 07 28 80
mobile : +33 6 82 90 37 85
olivier.dugeon@orange.com <mailto:olivier.dugeon@orange.com>