IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs

Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com> Mon, 31 July 2017 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC5A132598 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEO-ccEJp5dH for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B18131723 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DSK67528; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:02:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.43) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:02:32 +0100
Received: from BLREML501-MBB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.5.200]) by BLREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.43]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:32:19 +0530
From: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>
To: Dirk Goethals <dirk.goethals@nokia.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, Nagendran Ramalingam <Nagendran.Ramalingam@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
Thread-Index: AQHTCfvT34O6WQs1vkKeI7/GhwDFWqJuF6zA
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:02:18 +0000
Message-ID: <73BFDDFFF499304EB26FE5FDEF20F788508F8294@blreml501-mbb>
References: <D5A106C6.BA8B2%acee@cisco.com> <90a3d99e-20fa-ba54-dc9f-7f911f1bbb34@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <90a3d99e-20fa-ba54-dc9f-7f911f1bbb34@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.152.243]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_73BFDDFFF499304EB26FE5FDEF20F788508F8294blreml501mbb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.597F549A.00E9, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 470ac32c5cdc6fd8dadc6a4b27bdd324
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/GLqOInLStI20tyIk9FG8q406kA8>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:02:40 -0000

Dear Acee,
Please find the answers inline for Huawei implementation.

1. Does your implementation support for all 9 OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?
[Veeru] Supports E-Router
               E-intra and E-Inter area LSAs to carry  Loopback prefixes

  2. Does your implementation support for N-Bit Prefix Option?
   [Veeru]   Supports N bit set  for Loopback prefixes,

  3. Does your implementation support OSPFv3 Extended LSAs across the entire routing domain?
    [Veeru] No

  4. Does your implementation support per-area deployment of OSPF Extended LSAs (AS-External LSAs are legacy)?
  [Veeru]     No

  5. Does your implementation support full deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?
 [Veeru]    No

  6. Does your implementation support sparse mode deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?
   [Veeru]  No

  7. Does your implementation support any applications that make use of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs (e.g., Segment Routing)?
  [Veeru]    Support for Segment routing

  8. Have you done any interoperability testing with other implementations?
    [Veeru]  No

Regards,
Veerendranath

From: Dirk Goethals [mailto:dirk.goethals@nokia.com]
Sent: 31 July 2017 18:22
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs

Hi Acee,

I received questions w.r.t. the difference between 3 and 5, I guess you meant:
- 3 and 4 are about AS <> area wide
- 5 and 6 are about full<>sparse mode
See answers inline.
Dirk
Op 28/07/2017 om 21:20 schreef Acee Lindem (acee):
Hi Dirk, Veeru,

Please respond to the implementation survey questions below.

  1. Does your implementation support for all 9 OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?
DG> Yes

  2. Does your implementation support for N-Bit Prefix Option?
DG> Yes
  3. Does your implementation support OSPFv3 Extended LSAs across the entire routing domain?
DG> Yes
  4. Does your implementation support per-area deployment of OSPF Extended LSAs (AS-External LSAs are legacy)?
DG> OSPFv3 in legacy mode can enable extended LSA per area, but OSPFv3 in extended mode, cannot support legacy per area.
  5. Does your implementation support full deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?
DG> Yes
  6. Does your implementation support sparse mode deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?
DG> Yes, by default
  7. Does your implementation support any applications that make use of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs (e.g., Segment Routing)?
DG> Not yet, segment routing is in the pipe.
  8. Have you done any interoperability testing with other implementations?
DG> No, only some limited tests were done with Spirtent/Ixia

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email