Re: Database Over Flow Query!!

Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM> Fri, 11 October 2002 12:17 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18507 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:17:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <6.00767759@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 8:19:41 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 281240 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:19:41 -0400
Received: from 171.68.227.73 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:19:41 -0400
Received: from SMIRTORAW2K (par-ilm-dhcp1-vl133-19.cisco.com [144.254.54.214]) by fire.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id g9BCJe012601 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 05:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Importance: Normal
Message-ID: <ECEBIKJEBCOMCBDBKDNBEEKBCDAA.sina@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 05:19:40 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: Database Over Flow Query!!
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <20021011103615.77057.qmail@web40307.mail.yahoo.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Amit

origination of type 5 is a local policy therefore I won't call it mandatory
one could start originating prefixes in a progressive manner in order to
assure a smooth come back to a normal operation ...

Sina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of Amit
> Srivastava
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:36 AM
> To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: Re: Database Over Flow Query!!
>
>
> Hello Sina,
>       I just wanted to know is it mandatory to
> re-originate all the flushed non-defualt As-External
> LSAs after coming out of the overflow state or it is
> not mandatory.
> Regards
> Amit
> --- Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM> wrote:
> > Amit
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mailing List
> > [mailto:OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of Amit
> > > Srivastava
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:06 AM
> > > To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> > > Subject: Database Over Flow Query!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >    Actually i was going through the RFC 1765 where
> > in
> > > it states that when the timer expires the router
> > > leaves
> > > OverflowState and begins originating non-default
> > > AS-external-LSAs again. SO does it mean that it
> > need
> > > to reoriginate all the flushed self originated
> > > As-External LSAs again or it means that it is not
> > > mandatory to originate all the flushed self
> > originated
> > > non-defualt As-External LSAs but from now on we
> > can
> > > originate any new self originated LSA.
> >
> > what do you mean by 'new self originated LSA'? since
> > all non-default type 5
> > LSA have been flushed out whatever type 5 the router
> > generates can be
> > considered as 'new instance'
> >
> > when the router leaves OverflowState after
> > ospfExitOverflowInterval it will
> > simply reoriginate / originate whatever type 5 it
> > needs to generate, given
> > that it remains below ospfExtLsdbLimit
> >
> > Sina
> >
> >
> >
> > > Please Answer if anyone know the solution.
> > > Regards
> > > Amit
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> > > http://faith.yahoo.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> http://faith.yahoo.com