Re: [OSPF] "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02 - IPR Poll

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A791A6F2E for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3wtMOclVa_bg for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590BC1A8709 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1388; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437662967; x=1438872567; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=iImouM/r0/C/+/KDDWL4wvdk/vVFBD5XZb5oyYJGJKs=; b=F1/K2aTQmmmXRjBonYMbyO6e7gG7PaUYGqR56oeEyQ29BHSAWHfXjUq2 2ZeexEvUmH43VfGldkAjCnfIrZwxd8zqL2CqdvYvnXh834N20yglzKxAY LmyamPkb1J0jb4kBgcX9iPUxojYcorlfjhMCwCE6ckDV5GAthFZ8kEOO5 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CKAwCy/rBV/4UNJK1cGYJ8VGkGgx24RwmBSyAKhgECHIEwOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQEDAQEBIBE6CwwEAgEIEQQBAQMCHwQDAgICJQsUAQgIAgQBDQWILg20c5YkAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSBIooqhFMzBwaCY4FDAQSUYAGMOYFEhB2TOiZkgVuBPm+BR4EEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,531,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="171658561"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2015 14:49:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6NEnElU024306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:49:14 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.37]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:49:14 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02 - IPR Poll
Thread-Index: AQHQxUGTCb3Tf5LsF0eDXaDf5IwE5g==
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:49:13 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D6CB24.2965F%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D1D6A809.295EE%acee@cisco.com> <BY1PR0501MB138137CA67374B0B96AFDFC1D5820@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR0501MB138137CA67374B0B96AFDFC1D5820@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.241.178]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8C6C9C295FBFC84AA32503D728416A81@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/GU-Ia9gsFdifn2x4KyUddx5SOco>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02 - IPR Poll
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:49:28 -0000

Hi Shraddha,
I’ve updated the “Replaced by” field in the data tracker tool so that the
previous IPR disclosure is now associated with the OSPF WG version of the
draft. 
Thanks,
Acee 

On 7/23/15, 4:35 PM, "Shraddha Hegde" <shraddha@juniper.net> wrote:

>I am not aware of any IPR other than disclosed by Juniper.
>
>Rgds
>Shraddha
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
>Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:18 PM
>To: draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@tools.ietf.org
>Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
>Subject: [OSPF] "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" -
>draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02 - IPR Poll
>
>Draft Authors,
>In preparation for WG last call, please indicate whether you are aware of
>any relevant IPR and if so, whether it has been disclosed.
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf