[OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 26 September 2015 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D186B1AC418 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HzWrnIzUD9Fj for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989CA1AC417 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=498; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443227676; x=1444437276; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7TFdI8ywrL0vAJwICD3FObnXsz6wnn0VyGKNf5ZSYBY=; b=dJMZklXWhlzi8WhgurLe95IiMNEPa+ryBdoCQdmCtkA8p0+yNUWXjI9d 22Pw3JvacnBXQdaoaNEJoNF3aUmr0j4fwzQENcdaUkiS/lytTeTxOdBfs rIl1RzsUI+EHIk0XmxYb0vpVIwcjGAsGxLq2WL0OaCQIvR+nK9VA7fdQV Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BhBQAU5wVW/5xdJa1dgySBQ4Mkwi6BCjsRAQEBAQEBAYEKhCsjEVcBIgImAgQwFRIELogTqB6Pa5QmAQEIAgEfgSKSS4FDBZVsAY0MgU+ENpFBg203LIQBiQ2BBQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,589,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="190859783"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2015 00:34:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8Q0YYfK018442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:34:34 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:34:34 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (173.37.183.78) by xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:34:34 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.127]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([173.37.183.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:34:34 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
Thread-Index: AQHQ9/MdJMB0YsR7d0CkMD6XMtCYyQ==
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:34:33 +0000
Message-ID: <D22B605B.32E55%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2987ED915CBE8A43BD303E19BB9EBB07@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/GyRdlDE3_V38N1ILcXzXmA3ck3Q>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:34:37 -0000

In Prague, there was consensus in the room that this use case was not
covered by existing mechanisms and that it was a problem the WG should
solve. There were differing opinions as to the exact solution but that
should not preclude OSPF WG adoption.

Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
Document. 


Thanks,
Acee