[OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6860 (3977)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 12 May 2014 16:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493E71A0757; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBp_A2ne7JzO; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850731A0711; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5337718000E; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: Peter.Paluch@fri.uniza.sk, yiya@cisco.com, aretana@cisco.com, akr@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140512163236.5337718000E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:32:36 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/HYV3THN331nzuhT7dIRWeJz2u9M
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, akatlas@juniper.net, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6860 (3977)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:33:34 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6860, "Hiding Transit-Only Networks in OSPF". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6860&eid=3977 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Peter Paluch <Peter.Paluch@fri.uniza.sk> Date Reported: 2014-04-28 Verified by: Alia Atlas (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- To hide a transit-only network in [OSPFv3], the IPv6 address prefixes are omitted from the router-LSA. Consequently, when a Designated Router builds an intra-area-prefix-LSA referencing a network-LSA, these IPv6 address prefixes will be omitted. Corrected Text -------------- To hide a transit-only network in [OSPFv3], the associated IPv6 address prefixes MUST be omitted from the link-LSA. Consequently, when a Designated Router builds an intra-area-prefix-LSA referencing a network-LSA, these IPv6 address prefixes will be omitted. Notes ----- The change essentially reverts the paragraph back to the formulation from http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-05#section-3 . Most importantly, the term "router-LSA" is replaced with "link-LSA", as there are already no prefixes carried in OSFPv3 router-LSA whatsoever, and the removal of transit-network prefixes influences link-LSAs and intra-area-prefix-LSAs. Also, the change reintroduces the keyword "MUST" that underlines the behavior that is crucial to the proper implementation of the feature. -------------------------------------- RFC6860 (draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Hiding Transit-Only Networks in OSPF Publication Date : January 2013 Author(s) : Y. Yang, A. Retana, A. Roy Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6860 (3977) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6860 (3… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6860 (3977) RFC Errata System