Re: about Area Splitting

"Li, Ke Qin (Peter)" <keqinli@LUCENT.COM> Tue, 09 December 2003 08:23 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA16871 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 03:23:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <4.00C6CE45@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 3:23:40 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 63611527 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 03:23:40 -0500
Received: from 192.11.222.163 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 03:23:40 -0500
Received: from ci0026exch001u.wins.lucent.com (h135-252-18-18.lucent.com [135.252.18.18]) by ihemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id hB98NZ002089 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:23:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: by CI0026EXCH001U with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <WWPTJPWL>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:23:33 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID: <31C0F08B0D18D511ACC800508BAE7B4707F47DEC@CI0026EXCH001U>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:23:32 +0800
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: "Li, Ke Qin (Peter)" <keqinli@LUCENT.COM>
Subject: Re: about Area Splitting
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

Hi,

In section 13.3 of your draft, it states:

"Note that R1 and R2 will install a discard route for the configured summary
range. If the destination is not found in the attached area the packet is
discarded following the discard route entry in the routing table."

What does "discard route" mean?

"Note that the cost of on-demand TA should be set to maximum cost LSInfinity
(16-bit value 0xFFFF)."

Why the cost should be set to LSInfinity? When the TA is established, what
is the metric of summarized route of area 1 advertised by R1 into backbone
area?

Thank you.

Keqin Li

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sina Mirtorabi [mailto:sina@CISCO.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:13
> To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
> Subject: Re: about Area Splitting
>
>
> Keqin,
>
> Tunnel adjacency allows to both avoid suboptimal routing ( because of
> intra-area path preference ) and automatic partition repair when the
> area is partitioned and summarization is performed
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunne
> l-adjacenc
> y-00.txt
>
>
> There were some concerns regarding the recursive TA and a new
> version of
> the document ( available soon) will prevent recursive TA
>
> Thanks
> Sina
>
>