Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 30 August 2014 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2476F1A8A0C for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CyjGd1JXhAOj for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04F11A89FF for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn18so3862835igb.5 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zAYXgm+JKDUpBncVb6UE1lMSHhN4i4zSxmNNU54qP14=; b=cUx29e+VtOrU51PvJYl0bjmzSy1Xy/gSHMSQNu8pCu3ZS3OOHK26WZEsSbqm5yaIOV lsKMGLgY0hjotvUME0+BWr2c/8asKg2cgIFyONXq9GnFumXTdARCkhTQLWFtzzUIbvpw X5OKHrSBZY7qRQG7nT+hc9LxKRYW42LeOsX26M1fIQN4z6fDkoNYJgs9ere4FSqGj4Qp lPJdRadSZns1CGfsrWl8ngsaBrUeAr5kYnCfY+WXUkB6riyNbM6RCJWlFQ+YiaMiZvh1 aKn2nzsPmxPCm5+XFPwCdDAJ+uoE27VxGl9Z1jMMQ4Vz9DDOckm3e1xBFNcLMGD0NXnk B4jQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.84.9 with SMTP id j9mr1105787icl.60.1409403644238; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.89.232 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
References: <53FB8718.1090003@cisco.com> <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:30:44 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: bHnrzIbAzK2ESpUUOE4eh398Dx0
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6NH0NzYYrHAtvPwZ0oKFRUbVstYe4sMKn3GFxcZ4pXVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/I3DgMV5wOANK7DjN8FCjlhHPudg
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:00:46 -0000

Hi,

I have read this I.D., and support its adoption.

Dhruv

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com> wrote:
> This is a simple document with a few strong drivers (ELC and S-BFD)
> requiring it..
>
> Please share your support or objections in making it a WG document.
>
> Regards,
> -Abhay
>
> On 8/25/14, 11:57 AM, Abhay Roy wrote:
>
> [speaking as WG member]
>
> Two comments..
>
> 1. Section 3 has this text - "This TLV is only applicable to OSPFv2.".
>     I believe, this should also be applicable to RFC5838, i.e. for IPv4 AF's
>
> 2. Section 3 and 4 describes the scope as SHOULD be domain-wide. I
> personally don't see any real use cause of any lessor scope (Area or Link)
> since we have mechanisms to generate routable IP address for those scopes
> already. So I would suggest we limit the scope of this document to be "MUST
> be domain-wide". Any concerns with that?
>
> Regards,
> -Abhay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>