[OSPF] OSPF GR and BFD operability

Anil Raj <anilraj85@gmail.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <anilraj85@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CE21B3069 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ou4AIWJ98jsH for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56661B3045 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgeb6 with SMTP id b6so106980818qge.3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=l63IDciMq3FqcBFVpyeVrvDodDMQoniitxvk2aAQwMM=; b=VuIbZr9drkAzw+UTB7lEmMMMKLDJLzNthyUASI78nsVhwJlOXOa8zwi6/UnUIgoZhB 9c7lFyAM3t2xM42osoNKj+I2E8OVaQa7KYfFJXgOWDxlltxiq1ENVPGAstscRJx/Os5f rIjkJDypKTh+RaxYosv8K/kZD51lTwmOEdUk3cChzWxKI/xoe0qQG7VNY/Ax8Aj1GI1q y0qOSQWLrmRc5RknDVhcm5WvcZ7SIfNU+kSP0o5vO8rx43mTl4rMnVMm8Kpiq1CK4NvP txcB3MCMgM5PKzmvn5N71p/N6K8B/CwSzqSogKzpMHpPE3XRJpAl8UwaepCRqfIYP9OP iKxg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.132.71 with SMTP id 68mr70208588qhe.64.1440512384834; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.40.106 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:49:44 +0530
Message-ID: <CAPj3AOpO+o2hBp3J+mPXpwWiho5fMxE97b1SKsHigRfTQSGzjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anil Raj <anilraj85@gmail.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113510d4fe299d051e236c61
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/IVsxe5sx3Zqh9-ReA8eyFPVHCi4>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF GR and BFD operability
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:19:46 -0000

Hi,

I need clarification on the behavior when BFD notifies remote inactivity
for a OSPF session, when OSPF neighbor is undergoing Graceful restart? OSPF
router in helper mode will ideally inactivate the restarting neighbor only
after grace period, and if BFD notifies neighbor down to OSPF, should the
adjacency be terminated? If not, will it cause a blackhole for the entire
grace period if the neighbor is actually down?

Appreciate if you can help here.

Regards,
Anil