Re: [OSPF] 答复: Advertising Tunnelling Capability in OSPF - draft-xu-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02 WG Document Adoption Poll

I support.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 9:04 AM Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:

> Owing to different application scenarios, there needs to be multiple
> protocols choice to advertising tunneling capability.
> IGP extension work in the field is import. I support the document to be
> adopted as the WG document.
>
> Best Regards,
> Zhenbin(Robin)
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年9月27日 3:34
> 收件人: OSPF WG List
> 主题: [OSPF] Advertising Tunnelling Capability in OSPF -
> draft-xu-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02 WG Document Adoption Poll
>
> This draft was presented in Prague and there was some support of using the
> IGP to disseminate tunnel encapsulation support throughout the OSPF routing
> domain.
>
> Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
> Document.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>