Re: [OSPF] 答复: Advertising Tunnelling Capability in OSPF - draft-xu-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02 WG Document Adoption Poll

Anil Kumar <anil.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 October 2015 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <anil.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60B91B30D7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zv3z19fTcQ-d for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703241B30D4 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so133269753wic.1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=MDRU1MdA583diQxBZ9aRaIa5uUQY1Slj805BC0iokpM=; b=m47oHGs0sxmE9rINkaup/shDGB44lWfh9H/eFPDwD8FLELSLf74etN/EqjkfIhc9oz Pqu9Yrsl/m7IEigZZmhOPel49q/l+Rh/e620Hs55PJxjONe0Wz0oUDQ2YGTW94Od1as2 6L+U7boKAowKbG/BsqN7k7wt2MyN+ruavBzh4VjyDKE4FQaGhm56qpNjpHM9ICypNIKc /jcFyHdLX3zTwrh90uorZGqmuvfdPtTebp13QkxBexGhM5j+zipy//mPwFRK9MPFb4Bl hYdCgmKMTk4NnI6+e9cXS7YcfDfcxU7xG86WscZcQXe4pJJb+EXF7udUpf2iKToOm2PF bOfQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.57.242 with SMTP id l18mr26980648wjq.34.1444623134033; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D22C6B57.32EBD%acee@cisco.com> <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6505FC77645@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA579AC@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA579AC@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Anil Kumar <anil.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:12:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAC38=VFbYDsiCgH2+huwW=_SZJPf-pvr2RxVq8RYOeehkg-aOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86df7abd0d470521e088b0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/InzhK9NzP0VWzJCj0FUkEdxAcZs>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBBZHZlcnRpc2luZyBUdW5uZWxsaW5nIENhcGFi?= =?utf-8?q?ility_in_OSPF_-_draft-xu-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02_WG_Document_?= =?utf-8?q?Adoption_Poll?=
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:12:17 -0000

I support.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 9:04 AM Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:

> Owing to different application scenarios, there needs to be multiple
> protocols choice to advertising tunneling capability.
> IGP extension work in the field is import. I support the document to be
> adopted as the WG document.
>
> Best Regards,
> Zhenbin(Robin)
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年9月27日 3:34
> 收件人: OSPF WG List
> 主题: [OSPF] Advertising Tunnelling Capability in OSPF -
> draft-xu-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02 WG Document Adoption Poll
>
> This draft was presented in Prague and there was some support of using the
> IGP to disseminate tunnel encapsulation support throughout the OSPF routing
> domain.
>
> Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
> Document.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>