Re: [OSPF] [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-05

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Sun, 18 June 2017 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45A01294B8; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3bJS7blA4t8; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D29129486; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m125so62762898wmm.1; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G5TvQVb4i8MoeWPgs35hZro5tyktIxeXH79Ddl7my9Y=; b=lHRQQF4ZZvfPX3EvPTEkhvzjkbVteXbrPA+utTqYBH8UW84GLY4aMFeQ1YcdMp5DkS eVljZ6F4fZlH0ESurqPffPWbwL2u0+CprFEKg/G7ETqKAePy5IP3miBmHjly9TVolsoq CNjU6nC0Xfk8gYzDoTz2662Mu0TjAX0kVwx1CjnxyXwSCBqLuCDuP/dtw+juwR7cjmn4 LjMgxeZBfpCyO+hjJWZT0faISMeT2Dgs8jvWd4+hnAOp2r0nIcDk6NIfQxVbs7v+8J7a B1QP+UiivjUHa3XopDamhvzufX856KNnnNvafTRnpbOkEcXzFvXQpOCWG3EVmP7mYaRc MclA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G5TvQVb4i8MoeWPgs35hZro5tyktIxeXH79Ddl7my9Y=; b=F0g3+UhX/Uv8c8BYTzd5WKYo9queyodR0+gKaTU3n7PWyyUJS7KG8OpCiUZxoSgZXI hjy7WTJwH9Ku5VcONHWU9xralDFauLQDQ9WRy0c2Z/Wr2Oqh3ZXjLwvLoyHn692cYZZN BFuTYuo3w/juUGbRr1l4G/ZpHxZLv0EqAcrQ/hbt1E9AFUNRNLrwmXSg8E8Z3fU29Q6K HYK7NgTm9cKextuN4wUCEEwNmhHfmTD2v1Ynuw02toHAvbcvjGNC4OQyt+0y1nLYWNhl 3qASuj3nxCjz8Qu3x0QpcxHoITXamwCIh5xUOVFA8RRt512emOWLL+nfuq+zi3j01IBO bUig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyFbPDUjiQQslAHAJbSVMtb06EeZN0Z5q8oumWPokl8mh/TfJ4i vv2XZUdL3K64VsX3609oqHdC4ZJNcA==
X-Received: by 10.80.170.23 with SMTP id o23mr14562647edc.164.1497813466063; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.183.155 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D56C3FCB.B553A%acee@cisco.com>
References: <CABFReBq7EzS=ujGKj4FyLitji04ptpH5txbWq3C+UzHRvrOVig@mail.gmail.com> <D56C3FCB.B553A%acee@cisco.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:17:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hNOqNR0txsjaCvpbSdvJExhu8rSUEYnKeAKSO1Nja7oYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: "gjshep@gmail.com" <gjshep@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0df41c95ce86055240df9c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/KKZqxI2uVZYTcR_NdpBDKYXrdRY>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 19:17:50 -0000

Acee, can you refer to more specific section in  https://www.ietf.org/id/
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt>
draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt>
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt> ? I
don't think that it is assumed that BSL 256 and 512 in the same subdomain
would ever share labels ...  I sent the conceptual model on the AD review
for -architecture that all drafts follow (as far I understood/helped
writing them) ...

--- tony

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg, Authors,
>
> I support publication. Also, I have two comments.
>
>    1. It is somewhat strange to make protocol drafts standards track while
> the architecture and encapsulations are experimental.
>    2. The OSPF encoding will not support the second example in
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt. In
> this example, the BSL 256 and 512 are intermixed. While with the encoding,
> they would need to be two separate ranges of labels.
>
> I also have some editorial comments but I’ll just pass them to the
> authors.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Greg Shepherd <
> gjshep@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "gjshep@gmail.com" <gjshep@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 5:34 PM
> To: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>rg>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-05
>
> BIER, OSPF
>
> At BIER WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for
> some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a
> process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the
> work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is
> that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet
> our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and
> operator support.
>
> This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions/
>
> WGLC to run in parallel in both BIER and OSPF WGs due to the scope of the
> work.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
> (BIER Chairs)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>


-- 
*We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
that is not true.*
—Robert Wilensky