Re: [OSPF] [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-05

Acee, can you refer to more specific section in  https://www.ietf.org/id/
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt>
draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt>
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt> ? I
don't think that it is assumed that BSL 256 and 512 in the same subdomain
would ever share labels ...  I sent the conceptual model on the AD review
for -architecture that all drafts follow (as far I understood/helped
writing them) ...

--- tony

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg, Authors,
>
> I support publication. Also, I have two comments.
>
>    1. It is somewhat strange to make protocol drafts standards track while
> the architecture and encapsulations are experimental.
>    2. The OSPF encoding will not support the second example in
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt. In
> this example, the BSL 256 and 512 are intermixed. While with the encoding,
> they would need to be two separate ranges of labels.
>
> I also have some editorial comments but I’ll just pass them to the
> authors.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Greg Shepherd <
> gjshep@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "gjshep@gmail.com" <gjshep@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 5:34 PM
> To: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-05
>
> BIER, OSPF
>
> At BIER WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for
> some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a
> process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the
> work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is
> that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet
> our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and
> operator support.
>
> This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions/
>
> WGLC to run in parallel in both BIER and OSPF WGs due to the scope of the
> work.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
> (BIER Chairs)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>

-- 
*We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
that is not true.*
—Robert Wilensky