Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Fri, 01 December 2006 12:33 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gq7Zi-00086A-EU; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:33:06 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gq7Zg-00085B-UM; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:33:04 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gq7Zf-0006Ts-Jn; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:33:04 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2006 04:33:01 -0800
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB1CX0d5006428; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:33:00 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kB1CX0YJ020969; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:33:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:33:00 -0500
Received: from [10.86.104.179] ([10.86.104.179]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:32:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200612010243.kB12hPqt062617@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com>
References: <200612010243.kB12hPqt062617@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <285A9D7C-8A64-46CE-89CF-0C26B98F995E@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:32:57 -0500
To: curtis@occnc.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2006 12:32:59.0772 (UTC) FILETIME=[D61FDBC0:01C71544]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1975; t=1164976380; x=1165840380; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[OSPF]=20Re=3A=20[Fwd=3A=20[mpls]=20WG=20Last=20Call= 20on=20draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]=20 |Sender:=20 |To:=20curtis@occnc.com; bh=Aih36499HOqTosU68vGgaifJmeykdrE2zf+LpD6bJwA=; b=Dv50bfzdt5V0lMNb/IfV4mQLV5IURuJCiA9pc5nKDPteqInPVIw14kzknlpqktU0AvoXGYRr o44VcMHzVDoYMsf3mFDuvpmmVa4hgeJ1KlA1nrRsp2Dd4ZzHdTaiVceC;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b4a0a5f5992e2a4954405484e7717d8c
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
On Nov 30, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > In message <133D69D4-43D7-46D0-88E5-80FD8CB25CCF@cisco.com> > JP Vasseur writes: >> >> Hi Curtis, >> >> On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: >> >>> >>> In message <4354A088-B93C-457F-93FD-55B8EB4A861A@cisco.com> >>> JP Vasseur writes: >>>> >>>> Other attributes such as affinity should be used to not allows 0-bw >>>> TE LSP to traverse a specific link. This TLV is only used to report >>>> the number of such TE LSPs traversing the link. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> JP. >>> >>> >>> The provider already has the necessary tools that can be used to >>> accomplish this. If a general purpose tool (attributes and >>> affinities) is available which accomplishes something a special >>> purpose tool to accomplish the same thing is not needed. >>> >>> Such a tool would only be useful if the administration of the MPLS >>> midpoint (where the attribute is set) had no control over the >>> administration of the MPLS ingress or a border that is doing route >>> computation (where the affinity is set). I don't see any >>> anticipated >>> real world deployment that would benefit from this. If you do, then >>> please explain the deployment scenario. >>> >> >> not sure to see your point here ... I was mentioning that the aim of >> this TLV was not to avoid some links. >> Looks like you're saying the same thing. >> >> JP. >> >>> Curtis > > > My point was regarding a mention in that conversation that the value > of zero might mean no zero-BW LSPs have been set up or none are > allowed. Looks like I cut the wrong paragraph out of the > conversation. > > The existing link attributes and affinity are sufficient to indicate > the condition that no zero-BW LSPs are allowed if the administration > of that network decides to use an attribute for that purpose. > > I'm agreeing with you. great, thanks. Cheers. JP. > > Curtis _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mp… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Isis-wg] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Cal… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-iet… JP Vasseur
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… JP Vasseur
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [OSPF] Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft… JP Vasseur