IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-21: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 24 January 2018 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FC012D890; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:19:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUEJFZpezHqV; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71AFA12D880; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:19:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2086; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516763940; x=1517973540; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=icSiP7pATxomZh+RN9N9YMTI0WcK/5i+/nybnkoxnaI=; b=kVywZMdmLjqpbNOq4nvgp8/huN309rt/v96x5nLwLD/E4LzvYmZNdv+w 4kWH9Vxqha5sq7TdFGHTsid63Yx7dJGfo4Dtx6DLknarHIQq/yGlx1kuS Hxy47tSxDCYRVqzorSbDTdoqF3Rw3QZz0eUV6OAqjVf7HxWeCp6ygg+Mh A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AwAQBZ+mda/49dJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNCZnQnB4NWiiSOZYFbl2UVggIKI4UYAhqEXFQYAQEBAQEBAQECayiFJAYjEUUQAgEIGgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWKNRCzCIInilUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPgzyCFYM/KQyCeYMvAgEBAQGBOgESAYM2MYI0BYpdmSYCiBKNS4Ibhh+LaY1XiVACERkBgTsBHzlgVxEIcBVnAYF/gwmBTngBi1WBJYEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,405,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="346832969"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jan 2018 03:18:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0O3Ixl1002319 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:18:59 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:18:58 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:18:58 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend@ietf.org>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-21: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTlL2ygZNDznidbkSt+I9LSffPQ6OCWqiA
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:18:58 +0000
Message-ID: <29516298-0EC0-4C53-AA4D-2EACFECD20B0@cisco.com>
References: <151676205555.24100.16905148334920949075.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151676205555.24100.16905148334920949075.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9AA4310254450A49AE1F3CBF34453424@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/KudyyA48CPd2VHmrn4aeMjK5D_c>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:19:03 -0000

Hi Ben, 

On 1/23/18, 9:47 PM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

    Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-21: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    -1.1: There are instances of lower case 2119 keywords. Please consider using
    the boilerplate from RFC 8174.

This is clearly the intent. This change will be in the -22 version with RFC 8174 as a normative reference. 


1.1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email