IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net> Wed, 30 September 2015 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <psarkar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478FB1B5BF5 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6AoMpPpI4rx for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0781.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:781]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9851B5BF1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.224.11) by DM2PR0501MB1408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.224.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.274.16; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:57:57 +0000
Received: from CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.216.26) by DM2PR0501MB1389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.224.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:57:56 +0000
Received: from CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.216.26]) by CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.216.26]) with mapi id 15.01.0280.017; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:57:56 +0000
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
Thread-Index: AQHQ+rHmcRhLA+ujBk6ruiEe/oRn0A==
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:57:56 +0000
Message-ID: <6A3F4D8E-4D4F-4E9B-8026-1445B73F9BDE@juniper.net>
References: <D22B605B.32E55%acee@cisco.com> <BY1PR0501MB1381B0343F37E534E2CFAB8DD54F0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D22EB65C.32FF9%acee@cisco.com> <BY1PR0501MB138107954EB733C69D388CC7D54E0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D22FF12A.3323C%acee@cisco.com> <F41DF673-765D-44B2-9499-E47F3D2EABB7@juniper.net> <D22FFBCB.3325F%acee@cisco.com> <0E0FB058-0DC6-49BD-95BC-6E64584B1DAD@juniper.net> <C4D23725-19FA-4B30-9496-486836E001DA@cisco.com> <03C3AD8C-BA1F-4951-BE7E-367C95535484@juniper.net> <BY1PR0501MB1381D96FA2F88CF374D7E3C8D54E0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <ba7d718a973d4f17aa0d3392ad9d04c0@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <BY1PR0501MB13810C3D18F95BCADEE0D12BD54D0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <39fe6e2522b0468c8eccff66ec701555@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <39fe6e2522b0468c8eccff66ec701555@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150911
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=psarkar@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.10]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR0501MB1389; 5:7LJ9lRfCX4kv15TeQukrf0U2iNlrPbUzIiGD5iKIp3r9mYcfF2gdLjE7HjJ1QMoMWDYO2gTxXJnikivshIYNU1OompPUes0uX4zBKOURlxqMP3UAy6KnQx5Jq1gbaHxXoHjg3heRqAB8v/EncS/ugA==; 24:AKM5YwTCj3Q+StSg1wR2lwsUwNzHfW0sVnE0t6iUTV/oABK5mymJ8mPsOd4AOk7L4JQbBkPeza6N88oiubAHg5Aj+0Zc6gUXRLF6EkgGRps=; 20:3atKop1sAammQmTO6TPvPgZN7LYqnIwjOuUnXF8UejhutoJTUrzJEaB6+0i4nVmjusb7OL0CeM7rY6W/Rz7A8Q==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1389;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR0501MB138906BABC1E5782EA961955BC4D0@DM2PR0501MB1389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1389; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1389;
x-forefront-prvs: 071518EF63
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(377454003)(479174004)(189002)(24454002)(66066001)(40100003)(5001770100001)(106116001)(5001830100001)(4001350100001)(122556002)(4001540100001)(64706001)(106356001)(5001860100001)(81156007)(92566002)(105586002)(1941001)(19580405001)(46102003)(36756003)(19580395003)(10400500002)(99286002)(83716003)(50986999)(101416001)(54356999)(82746002)(86362001)(62966003)(83506001)(76176999)(97736004)(87936001)(68736005)(189998001)(5001920100001)(2950100001)(11100500001)(102836002)(5001960100002)(5004730100002)(77096005)(77156002)(230783001)(5002640100001)(5008740100001)(93886004)(5007970100001)(33656002)(2900100001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1389; H:CY1PR05MB1980.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6C28C949EF4C734C936B01D40DF40B8C@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Sep 2015 04:57:56.1905 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0501MB1389
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; DM2PR0501MB1408; 2:aF/qXqUTFxchloS5odLNdCq7B10w9q10SdEWbAt+QHYLqHbMC7dH5DuR+hy/o35jif4OC+7VAL1/okXgXPlOfiT8RLiCsO/4oPTWHyl2Joq8wtsZglAdC9ToSNC1zJVjupuoSxtb3cjmh1bz99jaJm2LOYsSJ2enX8gJ9oTOGJo=; 23:HOCaHGJCtFLVmhT2GWcE+hDLYu/s30ozy2YQxsY/SKwuMf5Nri/Z7khNrCoOID3Vrg+S/DNGQlgwY7XbTRksoiLxVb6KEmCdyacRpg0sLKyzcCq0QRcv5a5Myy/c1iC1dINqscE9KHzLZqtc9z8EjUC4+1KSGKo0ovz/ilfOhV6T3XU1MYpAyrQwRKCrDuUZ
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/L7Rl3BqVTOOgo7VhE6guQz9-PV8>
Cc: Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, Mohan Nanduri <mnanduri@microsoft.com>, "Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:58:20 -0000

Hi Les,




On 9/30/15, 9:45 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:

>><Shraddha>As I indicated before, max-metric can work in most common
>>scenarios but not all. There could be cases where an alternate path cannot be
>>found Satisfying the constraints so LSP remains on the link undergoing
>>maintenance since the link is still a last resort link.
>
>[Les:] Which seems to me to be exactly the definition of link of last resort i.e. in the absence of any other alternative use the link undergoing maintenance.
>??
[Pushpasis] What if the operator does not want any traffic on those links at all? Should not there be a way to ensure that as well? 

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email