IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Fwd: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib

"Masanori Miyazawa" <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp> Fri, 22 April 2011 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25066E0766; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e9tM8Y9gaLi3; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4D9E074B; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD05D17481F7; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:50:51 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JcjLnI5B2E11; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:50:51 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.cn.kddilabs.jp (yellow.lan.kddilabs.jp [172.19.98.10]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A12E17481C0; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:50:51 +0900 (JST)
Received: from miyazawaPC (dhcp228.wlan.kddilabs.jp [172.19.110.228]) by mail.cn.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4DA1E0002; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:50:51 +0900 (JST)
From: Masanori Miyazawa <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp>
To: wenhu.lu@ericsson.com
References: <4DAC8EBF.6080400@labn.net> <B1AFC093-ADA0-43DF-A185-B3D0B4729F6E@ericsson.com> <8249B703AE8442429AF89B86E8206AA26F3A395788@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <4DAD7D74.5080903@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DAD7D74.5080903@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:50:53 +0900
Message-ID: <006301cc0087$554d0e40$ffe72ac0$@jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acv+jBO5v3rCpeJQQJeB5Z6GOZsjowB+sQ4Q
Content-Language: ja
Cc: 'OSPF WG List' <ospf@ietf.org>, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fwd: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:51:19 -0000

Hi, Wenhu,

Thank you for your comments.

I agree the SYNTAX of TCs should be updated to take into account IS-IS, so,
I think it will be changed to Octet String (O..20). 

Also, the Reference will be revised to include ISIS.

Thank you,
Masanori

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Lou Berger
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:18 PM
> To: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: OSPF WG List; CCAMP
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fwd: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib
> 
> Authors,
> 	Please treat this as a LC comment.
> 
> Please send replies/follow-ups to ccamp (and Wenhu) only. (OSPF cc'ed on
> this message so they may know where the conversation has moved.)
> 
> Much thanks,
> Lou
> 
> On 4/18/2011 5:55 PM, Wenhu Lu wrote:
> > Page 7:
> > TedAreaIdTC has SYNTAX Unsigned32.
> > For ISIS, the area address is of variable length. Please refer to ISO
> 10589 2002 Figure 4 on page 16 and change the SYNTAX accordingly.
> >
> > Similar comments for TedRouterIdTC, TedLinkStateIdTC when applied to
> ISIS.
> > Also it looks like the REFERENCE only cites OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -wenhu
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Acee Lindem
> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:02 PM
> > To: OSPF WG List
> > Subject: [OSPF] Fwd: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib
> >
> > FYI for those not subscribed to the CCAMP mailing list - Please consider
> reviewing this draft if you are involved with Traffic Engineering.
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>
> > Date: April 18, 2011 3:19:27 PM EDT
> > To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
> > Subject: [CCAMP] 2nd WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib
> >
> > This mail begins a 2nd WG last call on:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-08
> >
> > The draft has been updated after the earlier working group primarily
based
> on MIB Dr. review and discussion on the ccamp list.
> >
> > This working group last call ends on May 2nd. This LC will be announced
> on the MPLS, OSPF, and ISIS WG lists.  Please send comments to the CCAMP
> mailing list.
> >
> > Lou (and Deborah)
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSPF mailing list
> > OSPF@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSPF mailing list
> > OSPF@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email