Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644)
Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 20:35 UTC
Return-Path: <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B2421F9956 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.595, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGxtYTarS4Cw for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7053921F98AD for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id ih17so1320508qab.12 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WkWQ5KpniXrOfC23nSbNgKYhio1MaGBfXy7ZjssmJOI=; b=UtSHdbU12zPEJ7npSHpsisLI8BvsuCiyMcLiftnTDrFr6lQD8fkAGIIwbSbEs9XBup kCPlKBaSaV4rtxsNt9SO9znRpv5U8gxvBRvHSyGUa/KpUBKJ+nS9g4dRGIlD0ZeQNzDi MW64gXAHI/Ko8gbpuflBGjnPfUf9jJW9pjnMLnvVqmLPVkyoqze8qmwVO0C+sSVc8PcD qzCzszsPNLgInoPC+1oYr7OcrsG3mkM6xbF8RCXf3jmOafb/UirTz1prDreHEbzWbN9e 6g2kd053QMO1yH/HCPci45gZwHY8RAmrms9CrGyL/hPk3lWs6Zn2y7FaZWGWhuop7v7V Lx+w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.71.145 with SMTP id h17mr4974316qaj.31.1370637349900; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.74.2 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFip=q5TjVzC7qO_sdJCCjXG-Vh+gMB4wGayH4XkY8vfuEuPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130607194649.DFE7B62114@rfc-editor.org> <D05F4D3D-528F-4E6B-86AB-914A0CA8AE99@lindem.com> <CAFip=q7aXGkROUSFCBqU+ZtOF8PU6eZpBSy-E2PS34uTFHnOSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFip=q5TjVzC7qO_sdJCCjXG-Vh+gMB4wGayH4XkY8vfuEuPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 02:05:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFip=q53EJnuCDRr_TVgug1c=gS9fAXqAiVg95qoG+mXsA5=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bea31745b5c4e04de96601d"
Cc: jmoy@casc.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:35:52 -0000
Kindly note that I've made a minor mistake in the RFC errata notes. It says, Notes: section 2.1.2 Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System. The interfaces Ia and Ib have not been added to the directed graph. By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial interfaces defined by IP addresses, router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ia . It should say, Notes: section 2.1.2 Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System. The interfaces Ia and Ib have not been added to the directed graph. By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial interfaces defined by IP addresses, router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router *RT10*should advertise a stub network to Ia . On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>wrote: > The corrected text should be as under. > The additions are noted in bold. > > **FROM** > > |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT| > |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9| > ----- --------------------------------------------- > RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | > RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | > RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | | > RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | | > RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | | > RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | | > RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | | > * RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | > * RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | > T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | | > O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 | > * RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | > * N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | > N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | | > N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | | > N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | | > N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | | > N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | | > N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | | > N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | | > N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | > N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | > N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | | > H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | | > *Ia| | | | | | | | | |5 | | | | | | |** > Ib| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | | | | |* > > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Preet DSouza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello Acee, >> >> I made two additions. >> The last two rows in the **To** column have been added. >> They are interfaces Ia and Ib which are represented as stub networks >> owing to their definition on a point-to-point link between RT6 and RT10 >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com> wrote: >> >>> Preet - Can you denote which boxes you changed and why? In its current >>> state, this errata should be summarily rejected. >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:46 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: >>> >>> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328, >>> > "OSPF Version 2". >>> > >>> > -------------------------------------- >>> > You may review the report below and at: >>> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3644 >>> > >>> > -------------------------------------- >>> > Type: Technical >>> > Reported by: Preet D'Souza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com> >>> > >>> > Section: 2.1.2 >>> > >>> > Original Text >>> > ------------- >>> > **FROM** >>> > >>> > |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT| >>> > |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9| >>> > ----- --------------------------------------------- >>> > RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | | >>> > RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >>> > RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>> > * RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>> > * RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>> > T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | | >>> > O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 | >>> > * RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>> > * N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | | >>> > N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | | >>> > N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | | >>> > N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | | >>> > N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | | >>> > N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | | >>> > N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | | >>> > H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | | >>> > >>> > >>> > Corrected Text >>> > -------------- >>> > **FROM** >>> > >>> > |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT| >>> > |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9| >>> > ----- --------------------------------------------- >>> > RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | | >>> > RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | | >>> > RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >>> > RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>> > * RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | >>> > * RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>> > T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | | >>> > O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 | >>> > * RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | >>> > * N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | | >>> > N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | | >>> > N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | | >>> > N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | | >>> > N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | | >>> > N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | | >>> > N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | | >>> > H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | | >>> > Ia| | | | | | | | | |5 | | | | | | | >>> > Ib| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | | | | | >>> > >>> > Notes >>> > ----- >>> > section 2.1.2 >>> > >>> > Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System. >>> > >>> > The interfaces Ia and Ib have not been added to the directed graph. >>> > By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial >>> interfaces defined by IP addresses, >>> > router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router RT6 >>> should advertise a stub network to Ia . >>> > >>> > Instructions: >>> > ------------- >>> > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>> > >>> > -------------------------------------- >>> > RFC2328 (no draft string recorded) >>> > -------------------------------------- >>> > Title : OSPF Version 2 >>> > Publication Date : April 1998 >>> > Author(s) : J. Moy >>> > Category : INTERNET STANDARD >>> > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >>> > Area : Routing >>> > Stream : IETF >>> > Verifying Party : IESG >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > OSPF mailing list >>> > OSPF@ietf.org >>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >>> >>> >> >
- [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3… Preet DSouza