Re: DR Election! clarification
Erblichs <erblichs@EARTHLINK.NET> Wed, 11 June 2003 20:09 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26271 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <19.00A0E346@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:15 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 45330501 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:13 -0400
Received: from 207.217.120.126 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:13 -0400
Received: from user-38ldvsd.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.255.141] helo=earthlink.net) by turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19QBuC-0005h7-00 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:09:12 -0700
X-Sender: "Erblichs" <@smtp.earthlink.net> (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-gatewaynet (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <004f01c33050$f54c6f90$1105f183@b90.tdd.sj.nec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3EE788E8.21377305@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:54:16 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Erblichs <erblichs@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject: Re: DR Election! clarification
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Kamatchi, Once a DR and/or a BDR is elected on a interface in OSPF, it doesn't change unless either vacates itself as the DR and/or BDR OR sometime in the future their is announcement that a 2nd DR/BDR is also present. Mitchell Erblich -------------------- kamatchi soundaram wrote: > > Hi, > > Lets assume there are three routers R1, R2 and R3 are connected to LAN > (broadcast network -- N1). Assume priority of all routers R1, R2 and R3's > interface connecting to N1 is 1. > > Assume, presently R1 is DR and R2 is BDR. > > My Question follows: > > If i dynamically change the priority of R3's interface to 2, what would be > the expected operation of OSPF as per RFC. > > 1) Will R3 becomes New DR or BDR?? > or 2) There will not be any change in the interface state machine?? > > Thanks, > Kamatchi.
- DR Election! clarification kamatchi soundaram
- Re: DR Election! clarification Rikki Nguyen
- Re: DR Election! clarification Erblichs