Re: DR Election! clarification

Erblichs <erblichs@EARTHLINK.NET> Wed, 11 June 2003 20:09 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26271 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <19.00A0E346@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:15 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 45330501 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:13 -0400
Received: from 207.217.120.126 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:09:13 -0400
Received: from user-38ldvsd.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.255.141] helo=earthlink.net) by turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19QBuC-0005h7-00 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:09:12 -0700
X-Sender: "Erblichs" <@smtp.earthlink.net> (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-gatewaynet (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <004f01c33050$f54c6f90$1105f183@b90.tdd.sj.nec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3EE788E8.21377305@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:54:16 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Erblichs <erblichs@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject: Re: DR Election! clarification
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kamatchi,

        Once a DR and/or a BDR is elected on a
        interface in OSPF, it doesn't change
        unless either vacates itself as the DR
        and/or BDR OR sometime in the future
        their is announcement that a 2nd DR/BDR
        is also present.

        Mitchell Erblich
        --------------------

kamatchi soundaram wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>   Lets assume there are three routers R1, R2 and R3 are connected to LAN
> (broadcast network -- N1). Assume priority of all routers R1, R2 and R3's
> interface connecting to N1 is 1.
>
> Assume, presently R1 is DR and R2 is BDR.
>
> My Question follows:
>
> If i dynamically change the priority of R3's interface to 2, what would be
> the expected operation of OSPF as per RFC.
>
> 1) Will R3 becomes New DR or BDR??
> or 2) There will not be any change in the interface state machine??
>
> Thanks,
> Kamatchi.