Re: Vendor attributes in TE LSAs

[Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>]

Udo,

I don't support this enhancement since it essentially removes any


Udo Neustadter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a GMPLS implementation, and part of my problem is the
> addition of company specific data to the TE LSAs. The Internet-Draft
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-udo-ospf-vendatt-00.txt
> proposes an interoperable way to solve the following two issues:
>   1. Companies that already applied with IANA for an SMI Network
> management enterprise code do not need to re-apply for sub-TLV values
> from the pool of numbers reserved for private use
>   2. Allows private attributes/data to be embedded in the TE router LSA
> (the one TE LSA that contains the router address TLV).
>
> I would like for the draft to be considered part of this working group.
> This work is an extension to the work done in
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-09.txt
> and
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensio
> ns-09.txt.
>
> Thanks in advance for your support.
>
> Udo
>


--
Acee