Re: Query..Pls help
Daniel Joyal <djoyal@NORTEL.COM> Mon, 25 July 2005 15:01 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dx4Sj-00006y-NX for ospf-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:01:49 -0400
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA27833 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <22.010B342D@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:01:47 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 80369483 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:01:44 -0400
Received: from 47.129.242.57 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0m) with TCP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:51:44 -0400
Received: from zbl6c004.us.nortel.com (zbl6c004.corpeast.baynetworks.com [132.245.205.54]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id j6PEpgK25870 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:51:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by zbl6c004.corpeast.baynetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3ZDVL35Z>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:51:41 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C59128.5DEDBFCE"
Message-ID: <6204FDDE129D364D8040A98BCCB290EF0FF6B4F2@zbl6c004.corpeast.baynetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:51:41 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Daniel Joyal <djoyal@NORTEL.COM>
Subject: Re: Query..Pls help
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Backward compatibility rules forbid changing the max-access of an existing object when updating a MIB. -----Original Message----- From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM] On Behalf Of Khan Amir-G20247 Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:35 AM To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM Subject: Query..Pls help Hi I'm having a query regarding OSPF MIB updates "draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-08.txt". In the current draft a new OSPF Host Table object "ospfHostCfgAreaID" has been added this object is of read-create type and is a updation to "ospfHostAreaID" which is now read-only. I don't understand why was there a need to introduce a new object "ospfHostCfgAreaID" when "ospfHostAreaID" already exist ? "ospfHostAreaID" was initially read-create only, it could have made to serve the purpose as ospfHostCfgAreaID serves now, if it woud have been enhanced to support the feature to configure the new area if one doesn't exists. Besides this, we have to update the "ospfHostAreaID" object everytime with "ospfHostCfgAreaID" object whenever its been configured by the user, which is a good as updating "ospfHostAreaID" directly. Pls revert back with your comments at the earliest. Regards Aamir Khan Motorola India
- Query..Pls help Khan Amir-G20247
- Re: Query..Pls help Daniel Joyal