IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 05 January 2017 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C7E129643; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:41:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1fI2uFwVVEM; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326D7129634; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9622; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1483645301; x=1484854901; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6OJg51EmLev+zeYruB2ppdezrPkEg3Ly5h/pV05z1bQ=; b=cGQU2yniHnR1cHLiFtezzidd3P0L12eW/9tFYwVDdsRVEin1ED37VhJl CA68RN9Esr5wVeml8ATYnmmD6W+SP41FkYdjpe7p+jGR5G/9pubeqnmqw EKIVWy9M4IF8oCaQU8BDes8AFFkJ1j00gkiadbK5g4zEtkOCW2r8wQTjC 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AXAQDsoG5Y/5NdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgnFHAQEBAQEfX4EMB41QlEaHf4d+hSqCCR8BCoV4AoFLPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFjKIRoAQEBBAEBaQMLEAIBCBEDAQIoByEGCxQJCAIEAQ0FiFUDGA6yFoc3DYJWAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZBYsmgk6BSQERATyFRgWIcYZgiwc4AYZVhnKDe4F2hQiJXIl6iEsBHzhtThUzg3BsgUdzAYY3gSGBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,322,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="369127616"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2017 19:41:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v05Jfdvx006036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:41:40 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:41:39 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:41:39 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSZ4lOmPE3DIvUcUeLjPARjbW9iKEqSF2A
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:41:39 +0000
Message-ID: <D4940A14.91868%acee@cisco.com>
References: <148355128660.12937.10479853684898662995.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmVwkXryxg5+Xsgu+oc0Dj2VeYFK2m_gOs4uDPiuCUO3cw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVwkXryxg5+Xsgu+oc0Dj2VeYFK2m_gOs4uDPiuCUO3cw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.199]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4940A1491868aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/NPmoTg0-XigCO1yt3Rs27oD6LPg>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:41:43 -0000

Hi Greg,

From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net<mailto:ietf@kuehlewind.net>>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-chairs@ietf.org>" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-chairs@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, <akr@cisco.com<mailto:akr@cisco.com>>
Resent-Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM

Hi Mirja, Authors, et. al,
I have question about allocating new LSA type number for TTZ LSA for Experimental document from IETF Consensus/IETF Review, as suggested in Section 14, rather than from the Private Use range.

Irrespective of the experimental track, this is an OSPF WG document which has going through both IETF Consensus and Review so I see no issues with drawing from values from the general range.

Thanks,
Acee



Or, which may be the best route, partition the Private use range into Experimental and Private and then allocate the new value out of the Experimental range.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net<mailto:ietf@kuehlewind.net>> wrote:
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ttz/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Questions on IANA section (not an OSPF expert, so please excuse me if I
misunderstood something):
- Don't you have to register both LS types 9 and 10 somehow?
- And do the "Types for new TLVs in the new TTZ LSA" create a new
registry or is this an existing one?

Other minor comments:
- What's a DR? Please spell this out!
- There is only little normative language used in this doc. Potentially
some more normative language could make things clearer. However I don't
have concrete proposals what to change and I believe the most important
parts are in normative language. So there is no urgent need to change
anything but maybe another check would be good to make sure normative
language is used where needed.


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org<mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status