IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897781293DA; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:26:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdsjHzLbyWk2; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:26:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05464127871; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:26:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-kaloom-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=X5nWtkuIIbGyYqu1mjCVcUB5LkxH5Ryqkp0t5F5UA/A=; b=Zyj+wVZZVvaGyG4lKGi2lK5i9IytLTvDfdIKu7jd/1rOAl8ibX0GeEKBh0PDE80FXr4jxYQ2f/HC76gHzr8wBrOMWStS9JesxAYAM8BvqZ16Yo1afcRhbo7WswXYKAkEtFqxWYv2I6P5+XgPsV8q8X0irftPhU6x737WwiBBNs0=
Received: from YTXPR0101MB2061.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.40.13) by YTXPR0101MB2062.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.40.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.302.9; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:26:09 +0000
Received: from YTXPR0101MB2061.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::547a:d52c:d27e:329f]) by YTXPR0101MB2061.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::547a:d52c:d27e:329f%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0302.017; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:26:09 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTdNhNgU3oQdebt06PMbEErNtljaNDF5MA
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:26:09 +0000
Message-ID: <768C6831-98FE-4786-871E-1F70B9280EA8@kaloom.com>
References: <151319970086.30105.10327182151493185093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5A32708A.9040101@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A32708A.9040101@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Suresh@kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [67.22.228.35]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; YTXPR0101MB2062; 6:dgj0ZRW4CnK2hPNzBw+E17Tl8p/aq6hPsKi1YxR86k0aePeYjDVHBvq0GuHDvPG6FntBL0uy3VCr31Xpezsy8t9LwgTERHTwg738KYjOJJ8sfAMV4oPIm/YSjhAFG+k2zK9qvQJGdPPUZaNQtDjZH12cDmy7K0VDjj3LC+re+dmjg/Obj5pZRW239IwhME6SYtmk8Jj2FdHpMkukRPmDUQUKCD2hwiFnYX9o4LiWXAUZH1Bdb1lBI0T+v5HJN+sDEP+/d9FVCEFvKSqaJbm+X/pDkzvPHkJnk1IgGVtzf0AwVp2pzYPjdb2+QPp5257vBYDqAvFuMhkgX+1aO3Wn0FucEaC5my72/Y+epxB29Ls=; 5:2mTLDy2mNnJbjdnlrORiZHWCqhvvFjmWxMe239ZauV6swB4j2jJ/Pnry+CRvOcY8Kf14eDUGRoM3GHGarbwiOvq70PGTcPokFi6dgdNA6N0qD8v93Y0kaQ6wmsNBhR/yz6N2v6EXNLmTB8jT35QQU3dcVKf73ROMD7a0Yh7TQIg=; 24:tpYF+0Gn5d1/XSGiofnJFPk+H6n2R1Lxn6GLGVxArzyqDI9TV7Ny4hSCup7E4HIzmip3eOckUPsCvjfScs3H5rLs6/s/k0AdUGQVMUeyDrU=; 7:pWeaS9tQ0frL7cixUNcKwib1kKjXjXZtQjxezXyQMeOJD1ac8rqlqXLMRM6/tXQz6TgjbAdT7UPbqB7c/y3T2k4p1Jrwt+p6nZdcaLGfixPrqodw2YWXLYelts2wZVt4ubc/7/h+l0ZKs1DBV4xIup/BCu5fH/9hrNZ5tLQyyb1+o/BqB5bODJ4j214pAwiGUmVwQfZ5Zg/Mz2sY75BQapzpkSuCPkW7f3Lsf6lNmzOOo3PYHphu/VX3x+8u0FXq
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d9daa439-6bd0-434a-0ce9-08d54317c447
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5600026)(4604075)(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(2017052603307); SRVR:YTXPR0101MB2062;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTXPR0101MB2062:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <YTXPR0101MB2062CC0AD001187D3348F996B40A0@YTXPR0101MB2062.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(3231023)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123564025)(2016111802025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:YTXPR0101MB2062; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:YTXPR0101MB2062;
x-forefront-prvs: 05214FD68E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39830400003)(396003)(346002)(376002)(366004)(24454002)(199004)(189003)(5250100002)(66066001)(82746002)(14454004)(80792005)(8676002)(53546011)(6506007)(81156014)(81166006)(966005)(97736004)(83716003)(25786009)(606006)(7736002)(99286004)(3280700002)(2906002)(478600001)(76176011)(72206003)(2950100002)(54906003)(86362001)(6916009)(3660700001)(53936002)(316002)(33656002)(2900100001)(229853002)(105586002)(230783001)(6116002)(6486002)(4326008)(236005)(36756003)(102836003)(8936002)(5660300001)(68736007)(3846002)(6306002)(106356001)(54896002)(6436002)(6246003)(6512007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:YTXPR0101MB2062; H:YTXPR0101MB2061.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kaloom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_768C683198FE4786871E1F70B9280EA8kaloomcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d9daa439-6bd0-434a-0ce9-08d54317c447
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Dec 2017 17:26:09.8155 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTXPR0101MB2062
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/NbgMeHjdn0K7fkWQatN_ePhGljc>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:26:14 -0000

Hi Peter,
  Thanks a lot for addressing my comments. Your changes look good to me.

Regards
Suresh

On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com<mailto:ppsenak@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi Suresh,

please see inline:

On 13/12/17 22:15 , Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* It would be good to clarify that this document is intended for OSPFv2 only
(probably in the title and/or abstract).

I changed the text in the abstract, which now says:

"This draft describes the OSPFv2 extensions required for Segment Routing."

It may also be worthwhile for the
document and/or the Shepherd writeup to explain why the WG decided to separate
the OSPFv3 extensions into a different document.

OSPFv3 SR extensions are based on the
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend, which is OSPFv3 specific. That's why WG decided to use a separate document to describe OSPFv3 SR extensions.


* I think RFC2328 should be a Normative Reference and not an informative
reference.

done.

Please see the updated version at:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-24.txt

thanks,
Peter


.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email