Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C256128BB7; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:37:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZTrSebFXnl5; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:37:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8797127A90; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:37:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1757; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513255048; x=1514464648; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XI0ktvESymbNhRw3A53D9EzMduvu7VC8kgVI8S0jhKM=; b=nKMOxLbiZsW5HAnypCeSXrV+bo+YIwNaejD6ivfIvgxbxDslnAuCpeC3 1I4F7zF0rs313aS4e2atFMabz7GeyC1e4x5lhv6nHYSNExbhB/IiC4gVU PF9dltkC4avSxGsV2zOzxHzDqdrXOAsiv2VtcGfw0wokN/Y53dGlgG2VK c=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,400,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="860724"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Dec 2017 12:37:26 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.18] ([10.147.24.18]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBECbOxw005954; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:37:25 GMT
Message-ID: <5A32708A.9040101@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:37:30 +0100
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, ospf-chairs@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org
References: <151319970086.30105.10327182151493185093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151319970086.30105.10327182151493185093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Ni-EVIm8G0xDfggcGcg9iC8L7Ko>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:37:30 -0000

Hi Suresh,

please see inline:

On 13/12/17 22:15 , Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-23: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * It would be good to clarify that this document is intended for OSPFv2 only
> (probably in the title and/or abstract).

I changed the text in the abstract, which now says:

"This draft describes the OSPFv2 extensions required for Segment Routing."

> It may also be worthwhile for the
> document and/or the Shepherd writeup to explain why the WG decided to separate
> the OSPFv3 extensions into a different document.

OSPFv3 SR extensions are based on the  	
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend, which is OSPFv3 specific. That's why 
WG decided to use a separate document to describe OSPFv3 SR extensions.

>
> * I think RFC2328 should be a Normative Reference and not an informative
> reference.

done.

Please see the updated version at:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-24.txt

thanks,
Peter
>
>
> .
>