Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Sun, 05 June 2016 19:01 UTC
Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8520212D0BF; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nb02yzqVyBX; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A6E12D1ED; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1471; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1465153295; x=1466362895; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+f/p50e0/BVt6TLVh7DcZBqEwRpDcvOXEvUr92zLWx8=; b=PsAV2bWEuxB8s5ZtD9KPSaQQxmJ9Q+sjbx9idxk0p2iC5PX7Z4b/pn6E afIKKQ9oORd4Z87rz/66AZv5GCkGMF94uvciFbJ52rV5geLMTyxKsEDof Lxw18hR0ag31a/QSxz39N+hNDHL15/ACByNSCX8q5hhA27cRyC5/icJ1q o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,423,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="637847981"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jun 2016 19:01:32 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.56] (ams-ppsenak-nitro7.cisco.com [10.60.140.56]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u55J1WNt024907; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:01:32 GMT
Message-ID: <5754770D.9080702@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:01:33 +0200
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <D375B4D3.631CE%acee@cisco.com> <D37771EE.6347F%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D37771EE.6347F%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/NjLcy3JB8-139AqxvVX71Pe8zcE>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:01:38 -0000
Hi Acee, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR on this draft. thanks, Peter On 6/3/16 23:45 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Authors, > > For the final time, can you confirm whether or not you are aware of any > IPR other than? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2401/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2233/ (the IPR statement on the non-WG > draft version) > > Thanks, > Acee > > On 6/2/16, 10:04 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote: > >> The WG last call ended a couple weeks ago and I will act as document >> shepherd and request publication. >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> On 5/4/16, 11:41 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" >> <ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable >>> implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews. >>> I >>> believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft. >>> >>> With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft. >>> Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th, >>> 2016. >>> >>> Here is a URL for your convenance: >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensio >>> n >>> s >>> / >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSPF mailing list >>> OSPF@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Clarence Filsfils