[OSPF] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> Wed, 24 December 2014 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <shraddha@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A001AD02F; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:58:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FFGC_S2LrJr; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0140.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F01B1AD02C; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:57:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.49.12; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:57:52 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0049.002; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:57:51 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions
Thread-Index: AdAfZ+2t8gRxJR1gRJOVEF41ljB4rw==
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:57:51 +0000
Message-ID: <BY1PR0501MB13819883015276791F20D631D5540@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.10]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=shraddha@juniper.net;
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381;
x-forefront-prvs: 04359FAD81
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(74316001)(19580395003)(107046002)(4396001)(229853001)(66066001)(230783001)(99396003)(86362001)(120916001)(76576001)(54206007)(46102003)(77156002)(62966003)(97736003)(92566001)(33656002)(101416001)(54356999)(106356001)(54606007)(68736005)(50986999)(102836002)(87936001)(2656002)(99286002)(31966008)(21056001)(122556002)(20776003)(64706001)(105586002)(40100003)(15975445007)(2900100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381; H:BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY1PR0501MB13819883015276791F20D631D5540BY1PR0501MB1381_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Dec 2014 10:57:51.5061 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1381
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Oi7-9CBZJY4C1XOKZufn9fzGCU8
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OSPF] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:58:12 -0000

Authors,


We have a "backup flag" in adjacency sid to indicate whether the label is protected or not.
Similarly. I think we need a flag in prefix-sid as well to indicate whether the node-sid is to be protected or not.

Any thoughts on this?

Rgds
Shraddha