IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator"

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 04 August 2015 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61DB1A019B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGKC5plQ1B64 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0ADA1A01EA for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1964; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1438700834; x=1439910434; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2t3FtGwvKpJL2hlCnBrUVnUR3+LiJXp3H4mC3qy148M=; b=i4vK2I3+cNHtmxBjgIpAnOida9t6YdlcbOjqaNqoPd8l9xTeGmgtR/uR H7P20D7IhNnq447W1rjkr2ncrixO3rHZxwx38E7M1avmD5nnzMO1jt7vN mk83d/AeSAfADaHd2lO0jhihUOnnjmlvhyQD9brezJL0t4K+umN+kHaUb A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8AwAF1MBV/5RdJa1bgxpUWw4GvGMJgXkKhXkCHIEXOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJAEBBAEBARoGEToLEAIBCBoCJgICAiULFRACBAENBYguDbUFljIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIEiii2EVTMHgmmBQwEElHoBhHyHU4FHhCKQCINkJoI/gT5vAYFHgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,609,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="175319295"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2015 15:07:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (xch-rcd-016.cisco.com [173.37.102.26]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t74F7DCU009940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 15:07:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:07:13 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (173.37.183.79) by xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:07:13 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.223]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:07:13 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator"
Thread-Index: AQHQzsc9WdvvjFn8qkuCSbpvPIOVfg==
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:07:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D1E64BD7.2A2B5%acee@cisco.com>
References: <E3AEB792-1175-45D3-9B01-C9D0A60F4EDE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E3AEB792-1175-45D3-9B01-C9D0A60F4EDE@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.26]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B4D0007A7B6DAB49B7968C0A2092D01D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Os3UzVgWhR87RnUJpp4HYs0X-Fo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:07:51 -0000

Authors, 
I have reviewed the document and section 2 needs to better describe the
processing of TLV. Especially considering that we now support multiple
instances of the OSPF(v3) RI LSA
(https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis-01.txt).
Specially, you need to address multiple instances of the TLV in the same
RI LSA or another LSA (e.g., you could ignore all instances subsequent to
the first in the RI instance with the lowest sequence number). When you
have selected an instance of the TLV, you need to detect changes and add
or remove S-BFD discriminators according.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 7/28/15, 9:02 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
<ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>The seamless BFD work is being advanced in the BFD WG. Hence, we will
>advance the corresponding protocol document.
>
>This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
>comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, August 26th, 2015. Note that
>we are doing a 4 week WG last call due to the volume of IETF WG last calls
>and the fact that many WG participants may be taking vacation in August.
>
>Here is a URL for your convenance:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator/
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email