Re: [OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3071A8948; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQQ8vE35ogkd; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 542971A8941; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1840; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444857126; x=1446066726; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bJVfoGV6P5ERkhYcNd7sFdIDNEjYiCTgGNS6KIXWD6A=; b=jgCCsDtIc7axVqhO25/MJpBoiJhqZOb5vnoAVD8t0jNYLMfZaTZmlN4L ZGtOVCc7v1WTBzN7c7HuEOaHZRuJI0Vh8OfepS2tAAlcnek1ALNLBFW1J s8Rr868ujkrqOlhUJ7CocT+nSv1tGrfLpsFAYi92AnxCyOknx64dkTP7e I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BiAgD6wx5W/4cNJK1egyZUbga4eYQhAQ2BWiGCcoIKfwIcgTA4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQnAQEEIxFFEAIBCBoCJgICAjAVEAIEAQ0FiC4NsBSTPwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEgSKKUoQqEQFRB4JpgUUBBIc9jlgBhRiIAoFYhDqVdwEfAQFCgkSBPnEBhS46gQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,682,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="198194361"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Oct 2015 21:12:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9ELC4L0010623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:12:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:11:50 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:11:49 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRBsHpWGkeOX0Ci0OqqdZXk7vylZ5rjUKA
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:11:49 +0000
Message-ID: <D2443D46.35947%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20151014205015.15090.27114.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151014205015.15090.27114.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.199]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0CEDE3221B827E4C9928E3F697B8A1B1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Owyky7LIZhTjZCmZaL5DwqEqbHs>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.ad@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.shepherd@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:12:07 -0000


On 10/14/15, 4:50 PM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

>Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The shepherd write up says that there have been no IPR disclosures, but
>there has in fact been a disclosure on an earlier version. Wast he
>working group aware of this disclosure?

Ok - must have missed previously disclosed IPR. Will poll again.

Thanks,
Acee 




>
>3.2, paragraph 4: "Each tag MUST be treated as an independent identifier
>that MAY be
>used in policy to perform a policy action."
>
>Given the context of the previous MUST, the MAY seems more descriptive
>than  normative.
>
>