[OSPF] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-10: (with COMMENT)
"Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> Tue, 06 January 2015 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD771A87AE; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 06:55:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XvQq3vjW7_z; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 06:55:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837C31A00A8; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 06:55:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.0.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150106145509.2890.85698.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 06:55:09 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/PV4WJ_MjbNaEtYwboQmmsWeX8t8
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:55:11 -0000
Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with Stephen that the specified use cases seem to warrant a stronger recommendation to provide authentication and confidentiality. The tools are available, so why are they not being recommended in this instance?
- [OSPF] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-iet… Brian Haberman
- Re: [OSPF] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [OSPF] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft… joel jaeggli
- Re: [OSPF] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft… Brian Haberman