Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

<> Mon, 01 September 2014 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D171A01F3 for <>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 09:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlksVXc09t4E for <>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 09:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB421A035E for <>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 09:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.198]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id C45672AC104; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown []) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AC43C18004F; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::a441:e6a9:6143:6f0f]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:07:33 +0200
From: <>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
Thread-Index: AQHPwKoSGbQFoOONyUaUf4QhM2C3GJvsdvvg
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:07:32 +0000
Message-ID: <15734_1409587652_540499C4_15734_4858_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A071DB06E@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version:, Antispam-Engine:, Antispam-Data: 2014.9.1.153022
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:08:21 -0000


This is useful for network operator to express policy based on node capabilities/performance/roles (e.g. PE/P/ASBR/BNG, access/aggregation/POP/Core, odd/even.).
In particular I support uses cases 2, 3 and TE/explicit routing policy (a la CSPF excluding "even" or "ASBR" nodes, in particular in the SPRING context).

- I can provide text & ascii art for the above additional explicit routing use cases use case if authors agree
- :s/ I-D.litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability/ I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability


From: OSPF [] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 11:18 PM
Subject: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

There are situations where node level policy is required and an OSPF advertised admin tag simplifies this. For example, advertisement of remote-LFA eligibility.

Please indicate your support or objections to adopting this draft as an OSPF WG document. 



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.