Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?
Arthur Dimitrelis <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM> Fri, 23 August 2002 00:47 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14847 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:47:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <4.006E6B3E@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:49:13 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 90058 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:49:14 -0400
Received: from 144.189.100.102 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:49:13 -0400
Received: [from mothost.mot.com (mothost.mot.com [129.188.137.101]) by motgate4.mot.com (motgate4 2.1) with ESMTP id RAA01878 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:49:09 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from homer.arc.corp.mot.com (homer.arc.corp.mot.com [10.238.80.38]) by mothost.mot.com (MOT-pobox 2.0) with ESMTP id RAA12281 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:49:32 -0700 (MST)]
Received: from arc.corp.mot.com (arthurd.arc.corp.mot.com [10.238.80.59]) by homer.arc.corp.mot.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7N0n37C000041 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:49:03 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B036F14C7A7FD511827000805FFEA8AD0C9EA1@eee-fs7.bham.ac.uk> <3D657D4D.852EE417@arc.corp.mot.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3D65867E.F0B387F@arc.corp.mot.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:49:02 +1000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Arthur Dimitrelis <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM>
Subject: Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sorry, I take that last point back. The said paper is available in electronic form, but I have no idea if it's free (in a monetary sense) or not. arthur Arthur Dimitrelis wrote: > Hi, > > there is a paper by Radia Perlman that answers your question, entitled "A > Comparison Between Two Routing Protocols: OSPF and IS-IS". It appeared in the > September 1991 issue of the IEEE Network Magazine. Contact me off list if you > need help finding it (it's freely available in electronic form). > > cheers, > Arthur > > "Liu B." wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Thanks for answering my previous questions. I am reading RFC 1142 (OSI IS-IS > > Intra-domain Routing Protocol), in order to compare OSPF with IS-IS. There > > are so many common things between two of them, such as area routing, virtual > > link, designated router ... what is the fundamental difference (or > > improvement?) between OSPF and IS-IS? > > > > Thanks again for all your helps. > > > > Bin Liu
- what is the fundamental difference between OSPF a… Liu B.
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Arthur Dimitrelis
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Arthur Dimitrelis
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Felix Lin
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Barry Friedman
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Arthur Dimitrelis
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Erblichs
- Re: what is the fundamental difference between OS… Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking