Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll on "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"

Michael Barnes <mjbarnes@cisco.com> Sun, 22 January 2017 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mjbarnes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B2D12947B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:23:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHHH1Wr5RDwi for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6765129477 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:23:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1696; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485127380; x=1486336980; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tx1C6lzkk60PdY6h9a5WtTLkekZgkH3uU8l9TxZsxR0=; b=luak4sI5SC6mrZVDVEhGlvMFiZL1PunluLzfgMtvBU/YM2rICWwdNuU3 wFORVpSwzYSxauKdMz9O9CIejJgZ0hD5p1yXyKw9WVhbcwAtXh05m9hZo xMFalpwiafdlSZHkkPn0RDXs3tzn75+8Fo6yHTJstqvFrAaoR+DCY7K8j o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,270,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="375128782"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jan 2017 23:23:00 +0000
Received: from [10.24.41.177] ([10.24.41.177]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0MNMx1X025024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 23:22:59 GMT
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com>
References: <D4A928F9.97D81%acee@cisco.com>
From: Michael Barnes <mjbarnes@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <fff712ec-b92f-2cd3-85ca-b6380dd3a3e4@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:22:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D4A928F9.97D81%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Qh-RNahM4Tsz81k8Sn2jNrvOpnc>
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll on "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 23:23:02 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

On 01/21/2017 12:04 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>   Please state either:
>
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>   appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
> .