IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-22.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF2112896F for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3v9OibtKDjC1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBBF0128959 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:09:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4062; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511784580; x=1512994180; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=G/j2PfLwp3mWSM8FLxSlcHGHKAAFnmOs5BjStmFXfUI=; b=OAfXIuoM/GaRBL+3thwXt08ouq+2dKL6Q+NaZ256cVXgNuqXEsoWtPRN ilxTBpUODjYHpiccjICmxs9xUoWDQ8TYN+FpNcdS/3u3ohZRAeFr/86F6 SqdhfY67cK9RJ022jb0bLRrseYmy9Rvi5vGatfFybKhfS2xItyDHK90tQ E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DNAADz/xta/4QNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM8Zm4nB4N4iiCPFIF9lm2CEQoYDYUWAhqEUT8YAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BayiFIAEBBAEBIRE6CxACAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FiiIQpSyCJ4p5AQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYEPgiuCB4M9AYMrg0aBVheCfoJjBZF2kFACh3C?= =?us-ascii?q?NGoIWYoUqiyyKN4I/iRcCERkBgTkBHzmBUG8VFiOCKQmETHeIVIEUAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,464,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="325423441"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Nov 2017 12:09:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vARC9dif029599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:09:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:09:38 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:09:38 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
CC: OSPF ADs <ospf-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-22.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTZ3Ub3CmU09f9z0SZrysxc3YCFKMoHrYAgABVYgD//64igA==
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:09:38 +0000
Message-ID: <D6416A76.DB5AD%acee@cisco.com>
References: <151178304613.30831.17764720155198424042@ietfa.amsl.com> <D641676F.DB587%acee@cisco.com> <5A1BFED4.2090901@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A1BFED4.2090901@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2C91C5858D1B4D408BD7ECC50B1EB752@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/QsXM4TSppMxzwa1JntlA0VM6WVU>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-22.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:09:43 -0000

Thanks Peter - I missed this one in my look at the new revision.
Acee 

On 11/27/17, 7:02 AM, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com> wrote:

>Hi Acee,
>
>there is one more change.
>
>TLV type for the SRMS Preference TLV was changed from 13 to 15, as value
>13 was taken by "Tunnel Encapsulations".
>
>thanks,
>Peter
>
>
>On 27/11/17 12:57 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> The only change in this version is to update the IANA IGP Algorithm Type
>> registry name based on our discussions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 11/27/17, 6:44 AM, "OSPF on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
>> <ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP WG of the
>>> IETF.
>>>
>>>         Title           : OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing
>>>         Authors         : Peter Psenak
>>>                           Stefano Previdi
>>>                           Clarence Filsfils
>>>                           Hannes Gredler
>>>                           Rob Shakir
>>>                           Wim Henderickx
>>>                           Jeff Tantsura
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-22.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 28
>>> 	Date            : 2017-11-27
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end
>>>paths
>>>    within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological
>>>    sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are advertised by the
>>>    link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).
>>>
>>>    This draft describes the OSPF extensions required for Segment
>>>    Routing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> 
>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi
>>>on
>>> s/
>>>
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> 
>>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-2
>>>2
>>> 
>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-ex
>>>te
>>> nsions-22
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> 
>>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extens
>>>io
>>> ns-22
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSPF mailing list
>>> OSPF@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSPF mailing list
>> OSPF@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>> .
>>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email