Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09
Vishwas Manral <Vishwas@SINETT.COM> Fri, 08 July 2005 13:07 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqsZT-0001GD-Hd for ospf-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:07:15 -0400
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA29820 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:07:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <16.0109EF00@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 9:07:08 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 78376602 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:07:07 -0400
Received: from 63.197.255.158 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:07:07 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C583BD.F0D5616A"
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09
Thread-Index: AcWC0IxxM5suhTGVTqy5QJCRTKSf3QA7UDyw
Message-ID: <BB6D74C75CC76A419B6D6FA7C38317B28A2ACA@sinett-sbs.SiNett.LAN>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 06:07:24 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Vishwas Manral <Vishwas@SINETT.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Hi Acee, Should we list the below as an exception too in the OSPFv3 update draft? Thanks, Vishwas ________________________________ From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM] On Behalf Of Vivek Dubey Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:19 PM To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 Hi Vishwas, Reason why i mentioned "ospfRFC1583Compatibility" draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-04.txt 3.8.5 Calculating AS external routes -------------------------------------- The IPv6 AS external route calculation proceeds along the same lines as the IPv4 calculation in Section 16.4 of [OSPFV2] and Section 2.5 of [NSSA], with the following exceptions: <vivek> It is not listed in exceptions and RFC2328 Section 16.4 has the description. Thanks Vivek On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 Vishwas Manral wrote : >Hi Vivek, > >Is there a reason we need to support compatibility with an older version of OSPFv2 (RFC1583) in OSPFv3? > >Regarding a previous mail of yours >"ospfv3AreaSummary: The variable should also effect NSSA areas. Description should be updated" >We will update the description to also state NSSA (to be consistent with OSPFv2 MIB). > >Thanks, >Vishwas >________________________________________ > From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM] On Behalf Of Vivek Dubey >Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:53 PM >To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM >Subject: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 > >No configuration support is provided for "ospfRFC1583Compatibility " in OSPFv3? > >Thanks >Vivek > > > > >On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 Dilip Kumar wrote : > >Hi, > > I would like to know if Router Address TLV's value field MUST > >contain a syntatically correct IP Address. I mean, is it OK if an OSPF > >router advertises Opaque LSA (TE) with an syntatically incorrect IP > >address (ex. 0.0.0.54 etc.) in Router Address TLV ? > > > >Thanks, > >Dilip <http://clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.asp>
- draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 Vivek Dubey
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 Vishwas Manral
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 Vivek Dubey
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 Vishwas Manral
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09 Acee Lindem