Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A75129B47; Wed, 3 May 2017 11:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id daW9djuZUm3z; Wed, 3 May 2017 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9482A129BA3; Wed, 3 May 2017 11:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6439; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1493834794; x=1495044394; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=WKVcGax/M+rhRdzVDdGy+28+60AHfKf+hXOb/ULwH8g=; b=DFCsVxYZkj27w0+JOJU0N0wXLZLDcTanLSZP5dMdIOOaGD7rfsL6Igpm ITUflvbF/YyuVwNElgIMwJNHxX7iMdjhAa5nKLZGcEtlcnkU1kAWITeUu DrPmTggb6Ol9ZXaSYO6ciCE6hfcsFzP391vtkwNBzkywzZWBaW9pQxLjd c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AyAQD3GgpZ/4MNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgm5nYoEMB4NhihiRUpA3hTeCDy6FdhyEJj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayi?= =?us-ascii?q?FFQEDAx0GVhIBCBEDAQIoAwIEMBQJCgQOBYohDrEigiaKbAEBAQEBAQEBAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBARoFi1iFA4Jmgl8FnVwBhxqLeYIChTmKJZQzAR84gQpvFUWFJoFKdod?= =?us-ascii?q?RgQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,284,1491264000"; d="scan'208,217";a="243873469"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 May 2017 18:06:33 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v43I6XKK021387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 May 2017 18:06:33 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 3 May 2017 14:06:32 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 3 May 2017 14:06:32 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>, Routing ADs <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
Thread-Index: AQHSxDf+QtIjFwE6yk+SPIAPxHlYTg==
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 18:06:32 +0000
Message-ID: <D52F9350.AC96F%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D52F9350AC96Faceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/R2oSmvTZ7APYMgKP76x5UA3IlUU>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 18:08:33 -0000

All,

The WG last call has ended and I intend to request publication as soon as we can close out the comments from the WG last call, Routing Directorate review, and shepherd review.  The majority of the comments were editorial. I believe al the others were clarified via E-mail response.

Thanks,
Acee

From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:55 AM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-12

This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your  support and/or
comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 1st, 2017. As is traditional for with
more complex OSPF WG documents. We are allowing for a 3 week WG last call.

For your convenience, here is the URL for the subject document.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

Thanks,
Acee