[OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com> Mon, 25 August 2014 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <akr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCB31A02CB for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.168
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eK-rzJMNgNZu for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 564DA1A0222 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3115; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1408993708; x=1410203308; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=QRp9HfkA2dXPJ5WjTBenKa1Dfvla3cejCqV0djmv+f8=; b=RcgRlp7JT4hF5ZkA5e/dISpnRIBoUBw4bihTwsDwF6SLpefwIqBk6VgL dgs7eGrD/yFinu9XBtK87l4EqJadJNfIfwTUEI3ckrCjFo587kPBnJ2F/ doSJGeA3jBkjEWy6lbdvDq3T+Z4Ocdb7cUbiVxF/A7uAIfs5m0oNuMkvY o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,398,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="350098914"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2014 19:08:26 +0000
Received: from [] ([]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7PJ8PVt027744 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:08:26 GMT
Message-ID: <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:08:32 -0700
From: Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <53FB8718.1090003@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53FB8718.1090003@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060602090905090707080006"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/RRG0a67QArUOTb_eg4p0muUX1IQ
Subject: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:08:30 -0000

This is a simple document with a few strong drivers (ELC and S-BFD) 
requiring it..

Please share your support or objections in making it a WG document.


On 8/25/14, 11:57 AM, Abhay Roy wrote:
> [speaking as WG member]
> Two comments..
> 1. Section 3 has this text - "This TLV is only applicable to OSPFv2.".
>     I believe, this should also be applicable to RFC5838, i.e. for 
> IPv4 AF's
> 2. Section 3 and 4 describes the scope as SHOULD be domain-wide. I 
> personally don't see any real use cause of any lessor scope (Area or 
> Link) since we have mechanisms to generate routable IP address for 
> those scopes already. So I would suggest we limit the scope of this 
> document to be "MUST be domain-wide". Any concerns with that?
> Regards,
> -Abhay
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf