Re: [OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03.txt

Hi Acee/WG,

I would like to bring up that this draft does not cover the application to Traffic Engineering applications (RSVP-TE/SR-TE). It only talks about and covers the traditional OSPF SPF computation. For truly achieving the objective, I believe this draft should also cover TE and all other types of computations which would result in transit traffic going through the node.

I realized that TE applicability was never specified explicitly even for RFC6987/RFC3137 and very likely that implementations might have adopted different mechanisms in applying the max-metric to TE as well that can cause interop issues. Perhaps that warrants a bis?

Thanks,
Ketan

-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 15 June 2017 01:19
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: [OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03.txt

The question of OSPFv2 complete blocking of transit routing support
(similar to OSPFv3) seems to come up every year or so. I’d like to WG last
call this document. Does anyone see any issues?
Thanks,
Acee 

On 6/14/17, 12:44 PM, "OSPF on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
<ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
>This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the IETF.
>
>        Title           : H-bit Support for OSPFv2
>        Authors         : Keyur Patel
>                          Padma Pillay-Esnault
>                          Manish Bhardwaj
>                          Serpil Bayraktar
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03.txt
>	Pages           : 8
>	Date            : 2017-06-14
>
>Abstract:
>   OSPFv3 defines an option field for router-LSAs known as a R-bit in
>   RFC5340.  If the R-bit is clear, an OSPFv3 router can participate in
>   OSPF topology distribution without acting as a forwarder to forward
>   the transit traffic.  In such cases, an OSPF router would only accept
>   traffic intended for local delivery.  This draft defines R-bit
>   functionality for OSPFv2 defined in RFC2328.
>
>
>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/
>
>There are also htmlized versions available at:
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03
>
>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf