Re: [OSPF] Call for WG Adoption "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FAD129508 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:45:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mdzJilR0o9nZ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E8F0129505 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:45:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DEX52148; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:45:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML703-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.177) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:45:07 +0000
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by DFWEML703-CAH.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.177]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:45:03 -0800
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Call for WG Adoption "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"
Thread-Index: AQHScm1GPlBb5NqC3E2cJg/Kayx5i6E/+BWAgAH9iYCAAAIM8A==
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:45:02 +0000
Message-ID: <594D005A3CB0724DB547CF3E9A9E810B3C189F@dfweml501-mbx>
References: <D4A64C96.94DB3%acee@cisco.com> <D4A64D92.94DC1%acee@cisco.com> <D4A7FA46.968F4%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D4A7FA46.968F4%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.213.49.88]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_594D005A3CB0724DB547CF3E9A9E810B3C189Fdfweml501mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090206.588292F4.00BC, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 4e367c36f4ada3cc56f3941ff77d0345
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/SLD8ieirIgGP_B7NGIJFSUKnYvo>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Call for WG Adoption "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:45:13 -0000

This is a useful draft which helps with scalability issue and network management. I support the WG adoption.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Call for WG Adoption "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"

A reminder, please consider WG adoption for this draft. It is a simple extension that allows only advertising TE in OSPFv2 or OSPFv3 in dual stack environments.
Thanks,
Acee

From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Friday, January 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] Call for WG Adoption "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels"

This starts a 2-week call for WG Adoption for the subject draft. The adoption call will conclude on January 21st, 2017.

The draft has expired but will be refreshed shortly.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te-06.txt

Thanks,
Acee