Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 25 September 2014 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BB01A2119 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Id7K8LvcDVoV for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C8F1A1BFD for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7285; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1411607222; x=1412816822; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=5+UI7NWGlvEMdXQ7RJ1WG+XkCg0tsjPztsdu6AVmQ5U=; b=V5rwzf41BXZAJipQ+zRUNpNoOBeh6uQhdYmtTNW0sGgJmd7SotXkuM8W 0Uxg4LvkvR81LlgxQjzz5sE8uTqZsmMKVAZ5mmJySpIiVxKKtj33GFJFe go1dO0J/5EyrA7m3nEGubWltCPreH8eXAZJggdEeuWvlP4B1PxWrJy+ej Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFAFhpI1StJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABggkhGU1vKOgELh0sBgQkWAXqEAwEBAQQBAQEaUQsQAgEIEQMBAiQEByEGCxQJCAIEDgUbiA8DEQ28cw2HIAETBI1ugh8NBAeESwWRXoQ6hHmCEI8OhkaCH4FDbIFIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,592,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="81022370"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2014 01:07:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8P170cs001879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:07:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.175]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:07:00 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacalone@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHP2ElEIsjx7Bl7kUuY1nqG2969V5wRPS+A///dBAA=
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:07:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D048E2DF.3981%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D041E4D5.3539%acee@cisco.com> <D048C0B7.3960%acee@cisco.com> <CAONEGYPyfgmZD1UzuhxO-UNxdMxGcL9A9+yfGDKLjrhToKU3fg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAONEGYPyfgmZD1UzuhxO-UNxdMxGcL9A9+yfGDKLjrhToKU3fg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D048E2DF3981aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/T1Zay6Bn3jWBxCCr2ne022dpolg
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:07:04 -0000

Thanks Spencer – copying WG

From: Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacalone@gmail.com<mailto:spencer.giacalone@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)

I am not

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:
This subject draft in WG last call has this IPR statement:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions

Authors – please indicate whether or not you are aware of any other IPR.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)


After more than 3 years of discussion and revision, the chairs feel that we are ready for a WG last call on the OSPF TE Metric extensions. While it is only one piece of an end-to-end delay/loss aware routing solution, we believe that the draft, as scoped, is ready. The WG last call will end at 12:00 AM PDT on Oct 4th, 2014. For your convenience, here is a URL:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions/

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org<mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf