Re: [OSPF] Routing in DC RTGWG interim - updated

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 January 2017 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87805129850; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78nZR03GrgBE; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA84B1295B0; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id b22so14132054pfd.3; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version; bh=/7srGKahxB2fL0MhIgLJoLSPfCNRwjH/iGZHN4+yqPU=; b=JYdBV+c4FOVIXsjqD7P5lPjIwZfCzeD0c1yDiO6H7i1Pr+pwGa3TetKHUY11T3lW1F vVAKqhBuJ5mewWx+K4bQ6b8+Klnz8uAaU9O8h1AIiwTZtUPOsBaRXYoPFHWq1H0m9KMA bnU5VQ2g3Mh1h9g/gwMFq3XPk7dRL7EsmU3r1NxA5aRCEWOBDcyJfHbaVGLVrVbbYoUZ deoUF7JRsF/c14JZa21pfK6gU2h5IymfCmma/Vi4LfNjde5LqZ4N3CHvjvymSyUrD9SB fGJCzyt2Jx/Pn4DjT3FXO6j8FQHiqRS/VoyFEqsLlhIn2SyslRqv/8ejcU7LCiPyp9wh aUgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version; bh=/7srGKahxB2fL0MhIgLJoLSPfCNRwjH/iGZHN4+yqPU=; b=BJTiqkvxFyMiARwkvujiJ/S/Y41OnLT86wmPqQT3nnBMlPkZDQLgnSNdNQNwzw4A8s rHANi+KsTPd/rpnqgzRD43BOaYa7vg6LYlnAWNKSQZgwJmdRAPYCK75XTHQJrESmhgj2 tgsT0F6xoTeb1fMjNvdTb5ZiYodtVpcE/75braht+j1K5Y3XBW+2l4/stXQa6sBQSVTl I/w3S408W19FpIwDQllLPuyX/ld2//+pq5evr+LjObkd4rTFvMMUQ85JXOZOLtUt7CRs avAYD2p5N3XOZ7owhGDxkAye1XxIRval54lRNHaeHLNC/JyN121UjmTYNrQdxnOFzjnz xpoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI4nbKLl0conYXUvXZATaDQjo+i2S+7iVyGA6UUQldCo2TxOP7qW37TRiYFqcl94Q==
X-Received: by 10.99.65.65 with SMTP id o62mr6444335pga.73.1484083153298; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.253.30] (107-1-141-74-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [107.1.141.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c64sm7928401pfa.91.2017.01.10.13.19.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:12 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:10 -0800
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <3DAD74E7-81E0-4A07-9560-994C462A720D@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Routing in DC RTGWG interim - updated
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3566899152_897103432"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/TreBEYqEpIhda8dyz46BVRbm-Nk>
Cc: Isis-wg <isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org>, 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Routing in DC RTGWG interim - updated
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:19:15 -0000

Hi,

 

Please find updated agenda for 25th’s interim

 

Presenters:

Problem statements:

Petr Lapukhov - FB

Dmitry Afanasiev - YANDEX

Russ White/ Shawn Zandi - LinkedIn

 

Solutions proposed:

Keyur Patel, Arrcus  - Shortest Path Routing Extensions for BGP Protocol, draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf

Naiming Shen , Cisco  - IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology, draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext

Tony Przygienda, Juniper - RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees, draft-przygienda-rift  (draft to be published later this week)

Bhumip Khasnabish, ZTE - Generic Fault-avoidance Routing Protocol for Data Center Networks, draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn

 

 

Thanks!

 

Cheers,

Jeff & Chris

 

 

From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 06:10
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>, Isis-wg <isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Routing in DC RTGWG interim

 

Hi Routing Protocols wg’s,

 

There have been number of recently published drafts and discussions on the topic

As discussed in Seoul, we’d like to have a RTGWG interim to provide the platform for both, draft authors and implementers to talk about what and why.

 

The date we have set is January 25, 9:00AM PST.

We will be reaching out to you.

 

Based on our preliminary discussion in Seoul we are planning to have the following presenters:

 

drafts:

draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf – Keyur to present

draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext – Naiming?

draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn -?

Tony P?

 

DC network designers:

LinkedIn – Shawn Z./Russ

Yandex - Dmitry Afanasiev

 

More to be announced

 

Thanks,

Jeff & Chris