Re: [OSPF] draft-kini-ospf-fast-notification-01

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> Tue, 05 April 2011 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <curtis@occnc.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59203A6840 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.160, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1aLGwdrYtD5 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harbor.orleans.occnc.com (harbor.orleans.occnc.com [173.9.106.135]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9B73A6821 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harbor.orleans.occnc.com (harbor.orleans.occnc.com [173.9.106.135]) by harbor.orleans.occnc.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3522K7P028995; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:02:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from curtis@harbor.orleans.occnc.com)
Message-Id: <201104050202.p3522K7P028995@harbor.orleans.occnc.com>
To: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:36:11 PDT." <BANLkTinCQ=saW1OUt2i8PAfdUPE8_-G_fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:02:20 -0400
Sender: curtis@occnc.com
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-kini-ospf-fast-notification-01
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: curtis@occnc.com
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 02:00:43 -0000

In message <BANLkTinCQ=saW1OUt2i8PAfdUPE8_-G_fg@mail.gmail.com>
Vishwas Manral writes:
>  
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> wrote:
> Hi Curtis,
>  
> > Has anyone measured the per hop flooding delay that is incurred in
> > modern routers?
>  
> From the few we have worked, it works from 10's of nanoseconds to
> microseconds.
>  
> You may see some work on
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-ospf-te-delay-00. We need to
> actually add per device delay to make the solution generic, which is
> what we are trying to work on.
>  
> Thanks,
> Vishwas


I'm not talking about forwarding latency, but IGP flooding latency.
In flooding you are not supposed to reflood something back to an LSR
that already knows about it so a CPU is involved unless someone has
put the flooding into an FPGA (these days who knows).

Curtis