Re: virtual link transit summary lsa
Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Fri, 09 January 2004 15:42 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA07074 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:42:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <13.00C99C38@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 9:18:04 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 67200585 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:18:01 -0500
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:18:01 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5396A12BFE6 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 06:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15053-01 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 06:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acee-laptop (unknown [172.31.254.73]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B01A12BFE3 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 06:18:00 -0800 (PST)
References: <001301c3d5bb$81e86e80$5f04060a@future.futsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-15"
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <opr1gnb4wp0p1q4y@smtp.redback.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:17:54 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Organization: Redback Networks
Subject: Re: virtual link transit summary lsa
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <001301c3d5bb$81e86e80$5f04060a@future.futsoft.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:16:20 +0530, Kishore Kumar Y <kishoreky@FUTURE.FUTSOFT.COM> wrote: > backbone transit area 1 area 2 > -----------R1-----------------R2----------------------R3------- > 10.0.0.1 20.0.0.x 30.0.0.x 40.0.0.1 > > > i configured a virtual link between router R2 and R3. > the cost for each interface is 10. > > my doubt is at router R3 10.0.0.0 network route entry path type > should be INTER AREA or INTRA AREA. > > according to RFC 2328 section 16.3 > while doing Transit summary lsa calculation path type should remain > same INTRA AREA or INTER AREA found during calculation 16.1 and 16.2 > > i feel path type should be INTRA AREA though the path is through transit > area. Kishore, You are connect, it should be type intra-area. You might want to assure the virtual adjacency is in the full state. > > > ******************************************** > Yarlagadda Kishore Kumar > Future Software Ltd., > 480-481, Mount Road, > Nandanam, chennai 600 035 > ph: 91-44-433 0550 Ex -305 (O) > kishoreky@future.futsoft.com > yarlagadda_kk@lycos.com > ******************************************** > > > > > > *************************************************************************** > This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL) > and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it > is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information > and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for > what it is intended. > > If you have received this message in error, please notify the > originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, > you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, > copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. > FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from > the use of the information transmitted by this email including > damage from virus. > *************************************************************************** -- Acee
- Why recalculation from scratch? Liu B.
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? Jing Shen
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? Yasuhiro Ohara
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? Manral, Vishwas
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? satish dattatri
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? Yasuhiro Ohara
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? Manral, Vishwas
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? Liu B.
- L2TP/OSPF Manohar Naidu Ellanti
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? satish dattatri
- Re: Why recalculation from scratch? satish dattatri
- virtual link transit summary lsa Kishore Kumar Y
- Re: virtual link transit summary lsa Acee Lindem