Re: FW: Last Call: Detecting Inactive Neighbors over OSPF Demand

Abhay Roy <akr@CISCO.COM> Fri, 30 May 2003 08:35 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA25136 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <22.009ED7EB@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 30 May 2003 4:35:45 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 44134151 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:35:44 -0400
Received: from 171.71.177.237 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:35:44 -0400
Received: from mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com [171.71.163.14]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4U8ZgFW023059 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Fri, 30 May 2003 01:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from irp-view7.cisco.com (irp-view7.cisco.com [171.70.65.144]) by mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.3-GR) with ESMTP id AHP56974; Fri, 30 May 2003 01:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
References: <LISTSERV%2003052814524118@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM> <3ED509DA.C7720CAB@earthlink.net> <3ED516E3.35CF71BB@earthlink.net> <Pine.GSO.4.52.0305281550290.22012@irp-view7.cisco.com> <3ED7062A.B5B24249@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.52.0305300120100.23116@irp-view7.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 01:35:41 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Abhay Roy <akr@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: FW: Last Call: Detecting Inactive Neighbors over OSPF Demand
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <3ED7062A.B5B24249@earthlink.net>
Precedence: list

Mitchell,

The important point to note here is that: If the originator is
'reachable', DoNotAge LSA's can stay forever.

Regards,
-Roy-

On 05/30/03-0700 at 12:20am, Erblichs writes:

> Lets cover two stones with one throw..
>
>         Lets try part of this again..
>
>         In the 1793 RFC which deals with demand circuits,
>         there is a 2.3 - 2) section that mentions MaxAge
>         seconds, aka 3600 seconds or 1 hr.
>
> To ensure that these LSAs are eventually
>       flushed from the routing domain, and that the size of the link
>       state database doesn't grow without bound, routers are required to
>       flush a DoNotAge LSA if BOTH of the following conditions are met:
>
> (2) The originator of the LSA has been unreachable (according to
>     the routing calculations specified by Section 16 of [1]) for
>             at least MaxAge seconds.
>
>         If probe exceeds 1 hr then LSAs are most likely
>         dropped and LSAs need to be originated. Thus, tell
>         me why you would want to allow LSAs to be forced
>         to be re-originated in favor of a longer probe.
>
>         I also think you may get a dead nbr, but that is
>         a different discussion point..
>
>         Mitchell Erblich
>         Sr Software Engineer
>         ---------------------
>
>
> Mitchell,
>
> In case of 'always up' DC links, it does turn out to be periodic
> probing. But in case of 'on demand' DC links, (if there is no data
> traffic) it's of no use to bring up the link just to send probes.
> So it makes sense to piggy back this event on the link coming up
> event, and keep doing it periodically till the time line remains
> up (due to data traffic).
>
> Regards,
> -Roy-
>
>
>
> Abhay Roy wrote:
> >
> > Mitchell,
> >
> > Why it MUST not exceed 1hr? Today it's infinity, so in theory any
> > interval (including absurdly high ones) should be allowed.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Roy-
> >
> > On 05/28/03-0700 at 1:06pm, Erblichs writes:
> >
> > > Sorry group,
> > >
> > >         I forgot..
> > >
> > >         E) If ..ProbeInterval is kept, its max value MUST not exceed
> > >            1 hr..
> > >
> > >         I think this follows that if we haven't heard from our
> > >         nbr in 1 hr "he" is considered dead.
> > >
> > >         Mitchell Erblich
> > >         -------------------
>