Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7849B131445 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ms4HaP7s4x1O for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C35131552 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3286; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1499277558; x=1500487158; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=V+mbFXlUDSOrtB9pxxIh81jFHIvqxYK/yleAEHhhPTg=; b=cferXe88QPo04dMuSA2w7n/CrRaFI6jV0LEn8J3LZq/HA56RwPPrdFko JahM+PZqjGpG3a8Hih/s7DKHOT0OCCsvYLyKB/kSCGH6yR0HGTobAplYj DNC6uXrjOSaoflqXpEeYMVRU0/vrJ+oUVo2SOaD8QHYX9BBEpPqfiNQ+k U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CYAADAKF1Z/4MNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1ljgRAHjgKnZ4IRIQ2FbgIagwI/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkCAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?BASEROgsQAgEIDgwCJgICAiULFRACBA4Fii8QrjyCJos/AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBHYELghyFLYMkgyaBICSDE4JhBZ8GAodFjD6CDFaEdIpIlTIBHzi?= =?us-ascii?q?BCnUVHyqHFXaGRIEygQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,312,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="448507221"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Jul 2017 17:59:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v65Hx16B025256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:59:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:59:00 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:59:00 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>
CC: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHS9bhhV3imuCcRa060/qbJo4hUpA==
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:59:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D5829ECD.B7231%acee@cisco.com>
References: <149909353388.22754.5117060785642160233@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149909353388.22754.5117060785642160233@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6027A7B15271D440A49BC37062BE399D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/VVM_dIUGg8CgyupsnzTz2x7XK50>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:59:22 -0000

Hi Alia, 

So the issues we are still discussing are:
    
      1. Common IGP Tunnel Type/Tunnel Attribute IANA Registry or simply
reference the BGP registries created by RFC 5512.
      2. 1-octet or 2-octet type/length in Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute
Sub-TLVs. I’d vote for 2-octet for RFC 7770 consistency even though the
BGP registry code point is limited to 255 types.
      3. Addition of the RFC 5640 ECMP block suggested by Carlos
Pignataro. 

Thanks,
Acee 
      

On 7/3/17, 10:52 AM, "OSPF on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
<ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
>This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the IETF.
>
>        Title           : Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF
>        Authors         : Xiaohu Xu
>                          Bruno Decraene
>                          Robert Raszuk
>                          Luis M. Contreras
>                          Luay Jalil
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05.txt
>	Pages           : 10
>	Date            : 2017-07-03
>
>Abstract:
>   Networks use tunnels for a variety of reasons.  A large variety of
>   tunnel types are defined and the ingress needs to select a type of
>   tunnel which is supported by the egress and itself.  This document
>   defines how to advertise egress tunnel capabilities in OSPF Router
>   Information Link State Advertisement (LSAs).
>
>
>
>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/
>
>There are also htmlized versions available at:
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05
>
>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-05
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf