Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt

Hi Eric,

there are definitely deployments using OSPF as PE-CE. It's typically 
used for enterprise customers, that use OSPF as their IGP and use L3 VPN 
service to interconnect their sites.

thanks,
Peter

On 10/8/14 17:45 , Osborne, Eric wrote:
> I'm not sure this has much value.  The vast majority of dynamic PE-CE is done with BGP; the little bit that isn't BGP is, in my experience, RIP.  I don't think I've seen many (any?) OSPF PE-CE deployments.
>
>
>
>
> eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Youjianjie
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 10:11 PM
> To: ospf@ietf.org
> Subject: [OSPF] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
>
> Hi all,
>
> This document discusses the use cases that OSPF is used to distribute FlowSpec routes. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format.
> Your comments are appreciated.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jianjie
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> 发送时间: 2014年9月28日 10:32
> 收件人: Youjianjie; Youjianjie; liuweihang; liuweihang
> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Jianjie You and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name:		draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions
> Revision:	01
> Title:		OSPF Extensions for Flow Specification
> Document date:	2014-09-27
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		11
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
>
> Abstract:
>     This document discusses the use cases why OSPF (Open Shortest Path
>     First) distributing flow specification (FlowSpec) routes is
>     necessary.  This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque
>     Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format that can be used to
>     distribute FlowSpec routes.
>
>     For the network only deploying IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) (e.g.
>     OSPF), it is expected to extend IGP to distribute FlowSpec routes.
>     One advantage is to mitigate the impacts of Denial-of-Service (DoS)
>     attacks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>