IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)

Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> Thu, 18 January 2018 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <shraddha@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9075712895E; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:32:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jr7oX4ZWwG_2; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A50C126C25; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108157.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0IIVjmh000503; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:31:50 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=WQTGe1H6qv8C8ogstH3pRNHruqfUx44fCPTU1eYndf8=; b=R+t/6XzwhK6dGcWMicsu+lR+LYTilKQnGTrZd18o9OrPIHB8d09DYsjQmgJ0NTyn0xNa onBcnWoaYAKTdWf/0QVNEPzPIzrM6jAFLoyUMPu4yYUl48xhYIHPbWPH3X3UgiG58WgB Mqg8nQJH5w0HiWBQ6o2vHTcy0WtGTVd/uaGxzpKd8T79G29RXfELIBtBx9DCVTurSBmc LhdNKR7LNIxE8xRrT6HjLuPp6KU7xRGk8c89zY8ROQBmFA2R1cPGccTtnzzHdvu+f0Dx uRXMOR6aKYNDQXhzy99qhFM95SKsYCkjc1WlK9+S8Fv8P3egu36p5c6QEfR4kT8CzFpP EA==
Received: from nam03-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03lp0024.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.24]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fk0xh801b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:31:50 -0800
Received: from BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.2.135) by BN3PR05MB2436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.3.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.444.5; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:31:47 +0000
Received: from BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.2.135]) by BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.2.135]) with mapi id 15.20.0428.014; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:31:47 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>, "acee@cisco.com" <acee@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTkHsleGAI3hVMz0OpFXeiLIYjPaN58oPw
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:31:47 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR05MB270626FDDAB9E5879FCE0CE7D5E80@BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <151629366736.20596.6495227203632608509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151629366736.20596.6495227203632608509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [122.167.236.34]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR05MB2436; 7:PRfZGj02v8GdX+X7tKSFCVjTwztGbiC2mxm2qusZRJ/sklRv5ZhIykJ85OqjUZ02qnH/WvpH/C0/lub45DPYJ9BuB0+1XyxhC0ikgcrqtK7cs0OnLyFpZTX90jziMNaKRT/imK9Hb1kq3p1IWB8z6Qjchqcakg4AEmfTZJiXhBJehcsh5KYLvoafE36+ls1shH5krRVpAcnTnBGSeuW5us0r4p66E+I/o8dQeJDuWyzsWzi6gxMdh3vbCNUNpKld
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a82d0a86-ab39-4b3f-0cd3-08d55ea1bb87
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534125)(4602075)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2436;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR05MB2436:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR05MB2436624CF7955F689AF64EFDD5E80@BN3PR05MB2436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(278428928389397)(95692535739014)(10436049006162);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231023)(944501161)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041268)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2436; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2436;
x-forefront-prvs: 05568D1FF7
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(39860400002)(39380400002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(199004)(13464003)(189003)(53936002)(7696005)(53546011)(6506007)(3280700002)(76176011)(3660700001)(102836004)(2900100001)(966005)(86362001)(575784001)(2906002)(77096007)(229853002)(110136005)(54906003)(316002)(26005)(9686003)(6306002)(55016002)(97736004)(478600001)(99286004)(8676002)(230783001)(81156014)(7736002)(305945005)(81166006)(105586002)(2950100002)(68736007)(5660300001)(6246003)(74316002)(6116002)(66066001)(33656002)(25786009)(4326008)(106356001)(14454004)(3846002)(8936002)(6436002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2436; H:BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: FrhRrPto+V9Yeqi6R80O/iE1jYxC8kmFe8W0yz+P7T7vHLvZ3UU3ZXDXrF/JF1FKTdudwCgC/cWqtiEK9NzR+Q==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a82d0a86-ab39-4b3f-0cd3-08d55ea1bb87
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jan 2018 18:31:47.1416 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR05MB2436
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-18_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1801180244
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/VdSpF5QZtRNwIrUcK3ug_bq0k3U>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:32:26 -0000

Hi Eric,

Introduction section does have a brief description and refers to 7.1 for detailed description of the use case. Moving detailed use case description to introduction section will make it cluttered.
Also there are other applications apart from 7.1 which also have a brief description in the 
Introduction and refer to application section for detailed description.

Rgds
Shraddha

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@rtfm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 10:11 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org; Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>; ospf-chairs@ietf.org; acee@cisco.com; ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_iesg_statement_discuss-2Dcriteria.html&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=3MyT2IBHmmEmtejJI2o73p3zIjhzSmGtffDprR-DdD0&s=TufjwL4DRLGVAWd56qU-6DaDDRfPsgeHp8JmN2XrdTE&e=
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dospf-2Dlink-2Doverload_&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=3MyT2IBHmmEmtejJI2o73p3zIjhzSmGtffDprR-DdD0&s=avFGB5zEal090OxCbLLU5A1NvjlOJREQPCY-yP7GTDk&e=



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this document would be clearer if the example in S 7.1 were in the intro. I was scratching my head a bit at the beginning and then got to 7.1 and it made more sense.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email